M
MenInBrown
Guest
For me, at best, I say it was pretty much dead even... Not on CONTENT, but because I truly believe JIM LEHRER was a complete waste of time.
Both men talked over each other and LEHRER, and LEHRER showed a lack of control from the very begining.
Romney could not control himself, he did not have command of his thoughts and "rushed" through his talking points. When Lehrer tried to stop Romney, Romney insisted on continuing to talk only to REPEAT the same thing he just said a moment earlier.
Same for OBAMA, When responding to MITT, OBAMA repeated himself.
This went on for the whole debate.
While of course I think OBAMA kept to the basics in explanations, Romney gave ZERO clear cut definitions on ANYTHING he had to say and merely stuck to his talking points.
I am sure NOT ONE of you can tell us how ROMNEY will create jobs, and if you can, you didnt hear that from ROMNEY. NOT ONE of you can explain what he will replace the ACA with, and if you can, you didnt hear that from ROMNEY. NOT ONE of you can explain what ROMNEY will do with medicare for future retirees, and if you can, you didnt hear that from ROMNEY.
AS for Romneys tax plan, once again, he DIDNT EXPLAIN what he is talking about. Obama is correct, by cutting taxes for the top 1%, that equals a 5 trillion dollar deficit, but ROMNEY wanted NO PART of explaining what deductions he would eliminate and for WHOM.
Instead, he kept insisting he wont add to the debt, but he leaves out who will make up that difference. Its clear that the deductions he will eliminate will come from the middle class, and that alone will increase the taxes paid by americans making less than 250K. Its crystal clear, yet ROMNEY refused to address that point.
He can talk around his tax plan all he wants, but you dont make tax cuts to the revenue stream without creating deficits, and you cant shore up those deficits without raising revenue someplace else. Its on the backs of the middle class where he will regain that lost revenue by eliminating all the deductions that "WE" currently have. TO believe otherwise is just plain silly.
The BUSH tax cuts alone cost this country 4.5 trillion in the national deficit over 10 years, and the extention of those same tax cuts added another 3.1 trillion to the debt over 7 years.
Those were NEVER PAID FOR.
ROMNEY cutting taxes again will add 5 trillion to the debt over 10 years unless he can make the cuts to the deductions that will total 5 trillion dollars.
Its simple math.
For me, I thought both men jumbled through what they wanted to say, and I gave the "slight" edge to OBAMA only because ROMNEY kept repeating his talking points without changing any of the words.
Romney was impatient with Jim Lehrer and spoke over him despite knowing the rules of the debate, and I believe that Jim Lehrer was just too old to control both men.
Peace
TOS
Ive never heard of a team playing defense for the whole game actually winning. So many people want specifics from the left. Thats because they have no clue waht to do...Romney gave you one example of creating 4 mil of his jobs, did you not watch the debate. And this was not a speech, this was a debate, they are suppose to talk over one another. I see you believe the lie that Obama got called out on about the 5 trillion dollar tax cut. But we dont expect liberials to understand what happens when 12 mil more people are paying taxes. Your simple math should tell you that that means more revenue you ******. You also missed the whole segment on Medicare. Besides if you think his bogus tax plan yall made up is going to create 5 trillion in debt over the next 10 years, Obama should go with that because at the pace we are going with Obama we will reach 5 more trillion in 4 years. Simple MATH remember! It hurts doesnt it....so funny to see you all worked up after your boy just got schooled!
Last edited by a moderator: