Jkloc420
Do you need an air compressor or tire gauge
@Please Call CenterWe were told because the contract had not been ratified and 22.4s were not allowed. That the 156 report language wouldn't start till this year.
@Please Call CenterWe were told because the contract had not been ratified and 22.4s were not allowed. That the 156 report language wouldn't start till this year.
How do they switch them around? Don't they have to follow seniority? Wouldn't the highest seniority TCD always work before others?
Your dedication to being completely wrong on so many different topics is amazing Dan.TCD's are put on road based on area knowledge, not seniority.
TCD's are put on road based on area knowledge, not seniority.
Your dedication to being completely wrong on so many different topics is amazing Dan.
Wrong, tcds get to bid routes and asked to work in seniority orderThere is no seniority for TCDs.
I have a question for my Southern Region brothers and sisters. We recently had language added to our rider in the Southwest pertaining to cover driver reports.
View attachment 296049
I know that the southern region has something similar in their supp.
View attachment 296050
My question is what type of success if any you have had with this language? If none what were the reasons? Does anyone know any TCDs that have filed a grievance for this?
I ask this because soon all our cover drivers will be filing a grievance with this language. I know the company will fight it tooth and nail and I'm curious how other locals have fared.
Thanks for any help.
This is exactly how I became a full-time driver. A cover driver had over 156 reports. I didn’t have to file a grievance just had steward take the issue up with management. My seniority was backdated months to when the 156th report took place.we have had jobs added because of this language.
just recognize that just because a TCD gets those punches doesn’t mean that job is his. we still follow seniority.
there was some confusion about that here, with some guys thinking that since they were the one with the 156 reports, that the job belonged to them.
usually we didn’t have to file either, just asked them to give us the driver punch count for said employees and there was a bid sheet pulled out and the process for promotion starts.
We usually only had 1 a year tho, not a lot at one time like you are saying.
If Dave says that they have no seniority then they have no seniority.I've never thought @UpstateNYUPSer was stupid, just ignorant.
He worked in a small (25 driver) building and was an off-the-street hire.
Not much room for promotion there....
I have a question for my Southern Region brothers and sisters. We recently had language added to our rider in the Southwest pertaining to cover driver reports.
View attachment 296049
I know that the southern region has something similar in their supp.
View attachment 296050
My question is what type of success if any you have had with this language? If none what were the reasons? Does anyone know any TCDs that have filed a grievance for this?
I ask this because soon all our cover drivers will be filing a grievance with this language. I know the company will fight it tooth and nail and I'm curious how other locals have fared.
Thanks for any help.
I've never thought @UpstateNYUPSer was stupid, just ignorant.
He worked in a small (25 driver) building and was an off-the-street hire.
Not much room for promotion there....
IE keeps up with it here. They won't announce the 156th report, but it is documented. Highest seniority part timer can fill the spot. No arguing over it. No way to hide it or deny it. Kinda strange its one of the few things they don't fight lately. Although they do announce it like they do it out of the goodness of their own heart. Riiiiiiight. Like they have a heart.This is exactly how I became a full-time driver. A cover driver had over 156 reports. I didn’t have to file a grievance just had steward take the issue up with management. My seniority was backdated months to when the 156th report took place.
Tough , they agreed to the terms of the contract. They should have payed more attention.The issue is. We're looking at around 40 cover drivers with 156 reports. I just don't see the company going for that without a big fight.
Tough , they agreed to the terms of the contract. They should have payed more attention.
Wow.The issue is. We're looking at around 40 cover drivers with 156 reports. I just don't see the company going for that without a big fight.
Wow.
The company should be happy they got away with that for as long as they did.
If you've got that many working that much then you should have had those positions all along.