Random testing, FedEx Express

[59 Dano]

I guess the disconnect here is that you view smoking weed at any time for any reason as an inherently irresponsible activity.

For the most part, yes. It presents too many issues.

 

[59 Dano]

I'd take a weed smoker over an alcoholic any day.

I'd take someone who is neither.

 

[It will be fine]

I'd take someone who is neither.

I prefer former pot smokers. I don't trust people that never did drugs.

 

[Bounty]

I prefer former pot smokers. I don't trust people that never did drugs.

Pot smokers are what ground needs....keep them nice and dumb, so they don't realize how your screwing them.

 

[dex 84]

I'd take someone who is neither.

Wishful thinking. And you can't legally discriminate against alcoholics if they don't take it to work. Plenty of em delivering and picking up for Express as I'm sure you're aware...

 

[Nolimitz]

And you can't legally discriminate against alcoholics if they don't take it to work. ...

Yes you can, It is not a "protected" class such as:

• Race – Civil Rights Act of 1964

• Color – Civil Rights Act of 1964

• Religion – Civil Rights Act of 1964

• National origin – Civil Rights Act of 1964

• Age (40 and over) – Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967

• Sex – Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Civil Rights Act of 1964

• Pregnancy – Pregnancy Discrimination Act

• Citizenship – Immigration Reform and Control Act

• Familial status – Civil Rights Act of 1968 Title VIII: Housing cannot discriminate for having children, with an exception for senior housing

• Disability status – Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

• Veteran status – Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974 and Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act

• Genetic information – Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act

 

[dex 84]

If they're a functioning alcoholic there's no way you can terminate them for it so long as they're never under the influence at work. A functioning pothead can never be under the influence at work but still lose his job over a failed drug test.

 

[Bounty]

If they're a functioning alcoholic there's no way you can terminate them for it so long as they're never under the influence at work. A functioning pothead can never be under the influence at work but still lose his job over a failed drug test.

Because it illegal.....genius

 

[Tom MacDonald]

I'm always high at work. Srs.

 

[Express Courier]

Because it illegal.....genius

Not everywhere. Alcohol used to be illegal. And since you probably don't know, alcohol s a person up a lot more than weed. Long term and day of use. It's common knowledge.

 

[Tom MacDonald]

Not everywhere. Alcohol used to be illegal. And since you probably don't know, alcohol s a person up a lot more than weed. Long term and day of use. It's common knowledge.

It doesn't matter, people will always judge what they don't understand. Yeah smoking pot obv isnt ok while I'm behind the wheel of a company vehicle but when im at home and my doors locked judge away idgaf

 

[59 Dano]

Wishful thinking. And you can't legally discriminate against alcoholics if they don't take it to work.

Wanna bet?

 

[Bounty]

It doesn't matter, people will always judge what they don't understand. Yeah smoking pot obv isnt ok while I'm behind the wheel of a company vehicle but when im at home and my doors locked judge away idgaf

I fully understand. It's illegal. You are probably more qualified to flip burgers than drive a truck.

 

[dex 84]

I fully understand. It's illegal. You are probably more qualified to flip burgers than drive a truck.

So seeing as the main thing you keep going back to is that it's illegal, will you flip your opinion once weed becomes legal throughout the United States?

Shouldn't be more than 10 years or so until that's the case...

 

[Bounty]

So seeing as the main thing you keep going back to is that it's illegal, will you flip your opinion once weed becomes legal throughout the United States?

Shouldn't be more than 10 years or so until that's the case...

It's illegal now and I hope it stays that way, but if it becomes legal what can I do. I guess I will have to set aside more money for unemployment and healthcare premiums to pay for the losers that smoke weed.

 

[overflowed]

Sounds like a typical pot smoker. Sounds like a guy I want working for my company. He's a loser too. You just make my case for me.

A typical pot smoker will not go to these lengths to keep his job or take care of his family according to your definition. Which was kind of my point. Sailed right over.

 

[Tom MacDonald]

If cigarettes were illegal I bet more than half the people here would be nicotine druggies.

 

[Bounty]

If cigarettes were illegal I bet more than half the people here would be nicotine druggies.

I prefer to hire non smokers

 

[Ali Oop]

This is a crock of crap! It doesn't seem as though Seattle does random drug tests. Most of the idiots at the Sea tac location off of air cargo rd seem to stay high, including managers and team leads.

 

[59 Dano]

I prefer to hire non smokers

Anyone who goes to an interview with the aroma of cigarette smoke doesn't deserve to get the job.