Republican Rewrite of US Taxcode

[floridays]

DIDO
Thanks for 9 more red x's, a red x from you equals a winner to me. That's new math. Are you afraid to open your damn mouth?

 

[Catatonic]

If tax rates are cut, history has proven over and over again that revenues increase. No I'm not kidding, I'm stating fact. Anything else?

I feel much better now. LOL

 

[BrownArmy]

In other words, high tax rates that many people avoid paying do not necessarily bring in as much revenue to the government as lower tax rates that more people are in fact paying, when these lower tax rates make it safe to invest their money where they can get a higher rate of return in the economy than they get from tax-exempt securities. The facts are plain: There were 206 people who reported annual taxable incomes of one million dollars or more in 1916. But, as the tax rates rose, that number fell drastically, to just 21 people by 1921. Then, after a series of tax rate cuts during the 1920s, the number of individuals reporting taxable incomes of a million dollars or more rose again to 207 by 1925.25 Under these conditions, it should not be surprising that the government collected more tax revenue after tax rates were cut. Nor is it surprising that, with increased economic activity following the shift of vast sums of money from tax shelters into the productive economy, the annual unemployment rate from 1925 through 1928 ranged from a high of 4.2 percent to a low of 1.8 percent.26

FACT

Here’s the problem...

You post an article that rips ‘trickle-down’ economics, then you post stuff like this that seems to support the trickle-down.

Which is it?

 

[Catatonic]

DIDO
Thanks for 9 more red x's, a red x from you equals a winner to me. That's new math. Are you afraid to open your damn mouth?

He has issues ... let’s try ant get him upset.

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

Tax cuts, boom, bubble, crash.
That's the history of tax cuts.
FACT

 

[floridays]

Copied straight from the Heritage Foundation. Not fact at all.

Really
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970 (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1975), Part 1, p. 126.eally. You're wrong once again. Nice try though

 

[floridays]

I feel much better now. LOL

Me too.... just fighting their class or income envy though, the losers unite club. The "kick a better off than me" club.

 

[newfie]

DIDO
Thanks for 9 more red x's, a red x from you equals a winner to me. That's new math. Are you afraid to open your damn mouth?

dude stop hogging red X's.

 

[floridays]

Here’s the problem...

You post an article that rips ‘trickle-down’ economics, then you post stuff like this that seems to support the trickle-down.

You have to be able to comprehend what you are reading, (you don't) not read into it what you want it to say.

 

[floridays]

dude stop hogging red X's.

I like to get them from these clowns, When they agree with me, I've failed miserably.

 

[Sportello]

Really
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970 (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1975), Part 1, p. 126.eally. You're wrong once again. Nice try though

Link, or you’re lying

 

[floridays]

Link, or you’re lying

Link or not, it's the truth. But her you go little buddy. tsowell.com/images/Hoover%20Proof.pdf

Now the numbers at the end of sentences denote a citation. Go to the bottom of the pdf and see the source he cited. Knock yourself out.

 

[floridays]

I feel like I'm at the casino playing the slots, little red x's all over the floor. Thanks kids.

 

[floridays]

From your post:

"Sowell states that "no such theory has been found in even the most voluminous and learned histories of economic theories." That's from a scholar who has published extensively in the history of economic thought. Several years ago, Sowell, in his syndicated column, challenged anyone to name an economist from any economic school of thought who had actually advocated a "trickle down" theory. To date, no one has quoted any economist who ever advocated such a theory. Trickle down is a nonexistent theory. Those who use it simply argue against a caricature rather than confront an argument actually made."

"Despite the facts that Sowell has marshaled, they will continue to use trickle down theory and "tax cuts for the rich" demagoguery, even though they now have hard evidence to the contrary, because they can count on widespread gullibility and inability to do critical thinking..."

Maybe you're the one who didn't read it.

You and @bbsam who gave you the Winner badge don't read well, the RED word above kinda changes what you wanted it to say.

 

[floridays]

Tax cuts, boom, bubble, crash.
That's the history of tax cuts.
FACT

Good job, smh, give all your money to the government, ward off the next crash.
Thank you, 45 red X's, from you today, must be a helluva gusher, better scamper to get your feminine hygiene products meat curtains. You can rebut and still give the X coward.

 

[floridays]

He has issues ... let’s try ant get him upset.

I've gotta disagree with that, he's already upset, and well past issues. Doesn't have balls enough to make a stand in writing, so he hides behind a red X. It's coming soon (the x), such a pussX.

 

[floridays]

dude stop hogging red X's.

I'm gonna build an addition with them.

 

[floridays]

I've gotta disagree with that, he's already upset, and well past issues. Doesn't have balls enough to make a stand in writing, so he hides behind a red X. It's coming soon (the x), such a pussX.

Less than 3 minutes, the can follow me around as much as he likes, here kitty, kitty, kitty, got that dido, pussx.

 

[wayfair]

and thats how we lose the red x..... thanks chump

 

[floridays]

Link, or you’re lying

Which was it clown?