Republican Rewrite of US Taxcode

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member
The basic design of this program combines permanent massive corporate tax cuts and other tax cuts for the rich with small temporary tax cuts for the rest of us followed by large tax hikes after a few years to pay for the tax cuts for the rich.
 

UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)

Well-Known Member
I agree with whomever stated earlier that this was an ideal opportunity to simplify the tax code. The average person should not have to hire an accountant to file their taxes.
 

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member
I agree with whomever stated earlier that this was an ideal opportunity to simplify the tax code. The average person should not have to hire an accountant to file their taxes.
But the tax code was not simplified with what they are likely to pass.

The basic design of the bill is permanent massive tax cuts for the rich and small temporary tax cuts for the rest followed by large tax hikes to pay for the tax cuts to the rich.
 

It will be fine

Well-Known Member
we'll see who's right in time.
We don't have to wait, you just need to read any of the available estimates of the bill. The entire trickle down theory is give the rich tax cuts and revenue increases with the resulting extra economic growth. If you have any downturn in the economy you've just blown a massive hole in the deficit for nothing, see Kansas for a real world example.
 

bottomups

Bad Moon Risen'
I don't think that this new tax code should be voted on until the new senator from Alabama is seated. Kind of like the reasoning the republicans used for the last Scotus seat.
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
We don't have to wait, you just need to read any of the available estimates of the bill. The entire trickle down theory is give the rich tax cuts and revenue increases with the resulting extra economic growth. If you have any downturn in the economy you've just blown a massive hole in the deficit for nothing, see Kansas for a real world example.
How do you figure? My tax bill will double from last year's $120,000 owed. I don't expect any tax break , but your 'rich' chant isn't true!!
 

It will be fine

Well-Known Member
How do you figure? My tax bill will double from last year's $120,000 owed. I don't expect any tax break , but your 'rich' chant isn't true!!
Again, we've been over this, your personal tax situation has absolutely nothing to do with broad economic policy. No one is impressed by the numbers you throw out.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
I'm missing something in this though. People talk about "permanent", but with the republicans changing the rules to be able to do this with only 51 senate votes, aren't changes just as easily made in five years or so?
 

It will be fine

Well-Known Member
I'm missing something in this though. People talk about "permanent", but with the republicans changing the rules to be able to do this with only 51 senate votes, aren't changes just as easily made in five years or so?
Yes, that's why reconciliation is a terrible way to make law. It's a convoluted bill with many of the middle-class cuts ending early so they can claim it doesn't add to the debt on a 10 year period. So a future unified democrat government can reverse all the cuts and have $1.5 trillion to pay for universal healthcare.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
Yes, that's why reconciliation is a terrible way to make law. It's a convoluted bill with many of the middle-class cuts ending early so they can claim it doesn't add to the debt on a 10 year period. So a future unified democrat government can reverse all the cuts and have $1.5 trillion to pay for universal healthcare.
And businesses don't even get the "certainty" they keep saying they want.
 

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member
I'm missing something in this though. People talk about "permanent", but with the republicans changing the rules to be able to do this with only 51 senate votes, aren't changes just as easily made in five years or so?

The word permanent is in reference to the design of the tax cuts in the tax bill, not permanent in the sense that another Congress can’t change it.
 
Top