And none of that sounds unreasonable, except for the 10x for sup working. because that is really up to interpretation for what working is...im training a new employee showing him how to load a can, and 20 people grieve it because the 20 mins i spent with him is 80 bucks in their pocket (in their mind atleast) it would cause way too many frivilous grievances
Every piece of that garbage is unreasonable! Now on to training if you are training and the rookie is working at the same time you are, that is a grievance! If your training than the rookie watches, when the rookie is working than your watching/training.
if you go pt to driver you sit on the bench for awhile, do you not? why would you think you wouldnt do it in feeders?
Not here you dont, you are giving a training route to train on for your 1st forty days, typically.
You cant bitch about having a PB delivery the size of a couch, when the company has the larger box trucks to do it, and you dont want them to use them.
Why not let ups freight steal all of our business and do the work for less than what we get paid? that sounds like good job protection. Anyone remember in 82 when the ptime wage was cut down? Ups started to get rid of the higher paid ptimers and used the cheaper labor.
alot of drivers dont expierence this but up here most of our 22.3s arent monday through friday, some have split days off (per bid choice) and non of them complain about it
We have a tuesday through saturday shift but you need to bid it, the new language could force us to work any 5 days in a 7 day period. So now if we take an rlo or call in sick on one of those days and then work what would be pur 6th day its at straight time.
and it should be continous service, if youre on disablity you shouldnt be gaining senority and you shouldnt be losing it either and since most fts are month apart in seniority its a non issue