The Border Crisis: Is Allowing Illegals To Flood In A Good Thing?

[UnionStrong]

They and their parents are subject to the jurisdiction of our country when they are here..if not, we couldn't arrest, fine, imprison or deport them.

While their parents are in this country they are automatically granted due process rights under our constitution. It's what makes us who we are as a people.

If you want to make the argument against the child being an American automatically means the parents get to stay I won't disagree with that. They can either give the child up to foster care/adoption or take the child back with them to their country. When the child is of age it can come back to this country if they wish.

Maybe because travel was so much harder when this language was written could explain why the ambassador language was included...when ambassadors and ministers got here they were here for awhile.

The Sen. Howard quote says exactly what the 14th amendment says. Foreigner and aliens are attached to the who belong to language.

I don't like putting conditions on citizenship and don't like trying to change the meaning of amendments to fit our prejudices. It's like people saying the well regulated part of the 2nd amendment gives the government rights to take away my guns.

I have a friend that was born on Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland in 1973...they lived there for 6 months before moving to Tennessee...he is now and always be a Yankee. Where your born is where your from.

 

[Thebrownblob]

I dont really like eggs but I didn't know they had gotten this high. Dont ask me why I screenshot the price of eggs in 2023.... I have no idea why.View attachment 509031

My wife does most of the shopping. I haven’t looked at those prices are crazy high.

 

[Thebrownblob]

They and their parents are subject to the jurisdiction of our country when they are here..if not, we couldn't arrest, fine, imprison or deport them.

While their parents are in this country they are automatically granted due process rights under our constitution. It's what makes us who we are as a people.

If you want to make the argument against the child being an American automatically means the parents get to stay I won't disagree with that. They can either give the child up to foster care/adoption or take the child back with them to their country. When the child is of age it can come back to this country if they wish.

Maybe because travel was so much harder when this language was written could explain why the ambassador language was included...when ambassadors and ministers got here they were here for awhile.

The Sen. Howard quote says exactly what the 14th amendment says. Foreigner and aliens are attached to the who belong to language.

I don't like putting conditions on citizenship and don't like trying to change the meaning of amendments to fit our prejudices. It's like people saying the well regulated part of the 2nd amendment gives the government rights to take away my guns.

I have a friend that was born on Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland in 1973...they lived there for 6 months before moving to Tennessee...he is now and always be a Yankee. Where your born is where your from.

I believe the parents leaving and taking their child with them, is the appropriate action. The child can decide when he’or she is of age. The point of that discussion is there is been much disagreement about this even with the people who wrote the 14th amendment. Sneaking into a country illegally and copulating would not automatically make the parents citizens, or allow them to stay.

 

[Jkloc420]

Get them out of here

 

[Thebrownblob]

Get them out of here

Let them stay!!!

 

[Thebrownblob]

Let her stay!!!

 

[Box Ox]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1883553850168381680