I only to ake insults from. Full time driversIt's passing man. I'm not even going to vote no. I just don't like the taste it's left in my mouth. Almost as bad as @IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U cooking.
I only to ake insults from. Full time driversIt's passing man. I'm not even going to vote no. I just don't like the taste it's left in my mouth. Almost as bad as @IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U cooking.
I'd bet it'll pass handily. Tons of shortsighted and short-time voters, and SOB appealed to all of them.It's passing man. I'm not even going to vote no. I just don't like the taste it's left in my mouth. Almost as bad as @IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U cooking.
I think it’s his hair.I'd bet it'll pass handily. Tons of shortsighted and short-time voters, and SOB appealed to all of them.
How much are we putting into our insurance per week? The pro contract guys are saying the West will receive $13-$14 per week to go into the pension.Yep, can't wait to see Mark put on a little razzle dazzle.
Wait for the "guys were not losing money... you're still going to make money. Everything is great and don't be mad at me for not standing up and saying NO at the negotiation table."
That's what we are currently contributing up to 2,080 hours.How much are we putting into our insurance per week? The pro contract guys are saying the West will receive $13-$14 per week to go into the pension.
View attachment 441057
I thought all you western cats got a new caddy when you retired.That's what we are currently contributing up to 2,080 hours.
Nah, they quit making the DeVille line in '05.I thought all you west cats got a new caddy when you retired.
How much are we putting into our insurance per week? The pro contract guys are saying the West will receive $13-$14 per week to go into the pension.
View attachment 441057
That's historic?That 8 percent increase is spread over 5 years..
1.6 percent annually…
That's historic?
That's for the part timers. Most won't ever collect anyway.Same as the sinking of the “Titanic”…
I would guess if problems occur some will be gone and retired by then.20 more years for you....
PerhapsI would guess if problems occur some will be gone and retired by then.
It appears he shuffled money aroundSeems non of them were the right choice as always. I just like pointing our how much people back their politicians then they turn around and do what you said they wouldn't. Yet some how you feel committed now so they continue to back then like a losing sports teams or something.
I mean we in the west are being told everything from, we are the reason 22.4s are gone and wages are the highest ever to yes we moved things around because you don't need it like they do. That's not internet gossip either. That's from trustees and national negotiation committee members.
So my question is did Sean actually stick it to UPS or did he just shuffle the money around to make it look like he did? I just get angry stares and finger pointing when I ask that. I'm sure someone would have asked at the 2 man committee but apparently only 5 questions were allowed until someone jumped up and said "I MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THIS HISTORIC CONTRACT!!"
BINGO. That seems to be the pattern . . . the Teamsters give us some magic figure and people get starts in their eyes and vote YES. Then, a few years later, they suddenly discover that it was all an illusion.That 8 percent increase is spread over 5 years..
1.6 percent annually…
That's for the part timers. Most won't ever collect anyway.
I'm amazed how the "best contract ever crowd" seems to all be on board? My feeling they want the increased dues that come with a big raise. Either that, or they just see the cute white rabbit?That Part time pension increase (65 dollars per service year) in Article 34 (Master) only applies to those who are hired after 2022, read it carefully.
$ 65 X 35 = 2275…
A lot of our senior part timers will see practically (no increases) when they retire under this TA.
That claim about it rising 8 percent spread out over 5 years is a falsehood.
Another issue is for our full timers under the IBT/UPS Pension Plan that had vested credits with their part time service. (No improvements)..back in “97” the Company was offering 50 dollars for every part time year. That in itself shows that those past part time vested years could be improved with this TA.
That often quoted 1000 increase will only apply to those who reach that service level of 35 years full-time at the age of 55 or over. Considering most of those full timers already have 8 to 15 years before they went full time and I am not sure whether those previous part times years are included in order to reach that 55 age formula.
The other formula listed for those past 60 went up from 175 to 185 per service year…over the next five years.
I'm amazed how the "best contract ever crowd" seems to all be on board? My feeling they want the increased dues that come with a big raise. Either that, or they just see the cute white rabbit?