when he says direct relationship with the employees you must understand managements translation ofthis statement.do not use a condomand do not use any anal lubricationmost stations posted fedex’s response to the house passing the faa reauthorization bill, and the senate not yet having taken it up (under bronczek’s signature), monday. It is rather long, but gives the game plan for fedex to defeat attempts by its hourly employees to successfully establish collective bargaining. It is full of the usual fedex euphuisms and distortions regarding the issues at hand.
completely absent from the document was any mention of the unilateral abrogation of the defined benefit pension plan last year, the “suspension” of the 401k matching funds (which was supposed to be our “remedy” to make up for the gutted pension plan) and the pay freeze that has been in effect for the past 10+ weeks (contrary to the “psp” philosophy fedex practiced till a few years ago). Bronczek states that fedex prefers a “direct relationship with its employees” (euphuism for a non-union company). When a company uses the “direct relationship…” phrase, it is carefully dancing around the fact that it is anti-union, and doesn’t want to have to compensate its employees as other union companies compensate their employees.
bronczek goes on to state that both the teamsters and ups are in favor of fedex losing its rla exemption, which by definition is bad for fedex. He is absolutely right. It would be bad for the senior management and executives to have a union make its way into express, and force a halt to the take-away’s which have characterized the relationship for the past few years. No hourly employee should ever make the mistake of assuming that what is good for fedex (the corporation) is good for them too; since psp has died and has been replaced with a disingenuous employer/employee relationship (that “direct relationship with its employees” garbage).
other airlines (this is how express views itself, as a part 121 cargo airline, not a company which moves packages from shipper to recipient), that have the “direct relationship…” with its employees are notorious for having low wages, poor benefits, poor working conditions and constant maneuvering by executive management to see just how many concessions they can get out of their employees, before they either generate an excessive turn-over rate, or unionize. We all know the turn-over rate fedex has experienced in the past few years. If it wasn’t for the economy tanking late last year, the turn-over rate would’ve been astronomical this year.
don’t allow fedex get away with completing the process of turning us into “package monkeys”. Write your senators and let them know we need to have fedex’s rla exemption revoked, so that we have some power to say no to the abuse that we’ve been experiencing.
as an aside to my previous post, check the latest addition to the teamster’s site for fedex mechanics:
www.fedxmx.com (no www…)
the morning after i wrote my post (evening of may 28th), the teamsters recommended writing your senators to get them to include the revocation of fedex’s rla exemption. Sound advice if i may say so myself...
we all know that june 1, 2009 was the start of the fiscal year for fedex (where budgets and allowances are started from). If you haven’t already done so, check the balance for your uniform allowance for the fiscal year… then ask your manager why the balance is what it is… you’ll get a kick out of the answer.
when he says direct relationship with the employees you must understand managements translation ofthis statement.do not use a condomand do not use any anal lubrication
@ 11 years with the company i maid $93,000 Gross + benefits and pension - $888.00 union dues a year, + 10% Discount on company stock + Tips. Ill let you add that up.
You know it's a great country when someone who can't even pass 6th grade spelling can make almost $100k. You made $93,000....the maid cleans your house.![]()
You know it's a great country when someone who can't even pass 6th grade spelling can make almost $100k. You made $93,000....the maid cleans your house.![]()
Call it whatever you want, just pointing out a grammar error as everyone on here is so apt to do. Can't have any fun around here anymore.....
It's not really a loss of market share as it is the economy as a whole. Everyone's volume is down, or has at least shifted more towards deferred products rather than overnight. It's not b/c everyone is jumping ship to UPS or vice versa. It's a cycle that has happened before and will again......just like the natural heating and cooling cycles of the earth. (Or is that Global Warming?)
Of course the earnings won't be pretty, who's are these days? Tough to increase earnings with 1998 volume and 10-11 years worth of inflation and health care costs thrown in. The RLA issue is completely separate and has nothing to do with the earnings statement, but is obviously a big issue. If the analysts don't look past that, they aren't doing their job and that is their fault, not FedEx/Fred's.
Yes you are right! But by making $93,000.00 last year he can afford a maid!!![]()
Yes you are right! But by making $93,000.00 last year he can afford a maid!!![]()
Well, at least somebody got it. That was more of my point than trying to "attack" them, my fault though for poor choice of wording.
Mr. FedEx--I'm not trying to spin the economy in any way, it's a fact that the economy sucks right now. I know some of the mgrs won't shut up about it, and people get sick of hearing about it, but unfortunately there are many employees that don't read the paper or have any idea what is really going on. It would be very naive of us to operate as if there is nothing wrong and let everyone get 10 hrs of OT a week, if any at all.
You, and others, may feel that your raises have not been up to par, and that is fine. I was a courier for 7-8 yrs and felt that I was paid fairly. I never washed my truck on my day off or worked off the clock, I just enjoyed what I did.
Again, why should FedEx have to pay the same, or about the same, as UPS? It has been pointed out in many threads that UPS is a more profitable company, so why shouldn't they pay more? It's all about the market, supply and demand. If people are willing to work for $13-$24/hr, why increase it? (From the company's perspective, not yours) Why should any company be expected/required to pay the same as a competitor? Their prices would be the same if all else was equal, and who loses? The customer.
If all it takes to get your loyalty back is for Fred to buy it, well that pretty much shows where your motivation lies. I think you have more integrity than that.
Well, at least somebody got it. That was more of my point than trying to "attack" them, my fault though for poor choice of wording.
Mr. FedEx--I'm not trying to spin the economy in any way, it's a fact that the economy sucks right now. I know some of the mgrs won't shut up about it, and people get sick of hearing about it, but unfortunately there are many employees that don't read the paper or have any idea what is really going on. It would be very naive of us to operate as if there is nothing wrong and let everyone get 10 hrs of OT a week, if any at all.
You, and others, may feel that your raises have not been up to par, and that is fine. I was a courier for 7-8 yrs and felt that I was paid fairly. I never washed my truck on my day off or worked off the clock, I just enjoyed what I did.
Again, why should FedEx have to pay the same, or about the same, as UPS? It has been pointed out in many threads that UPS is a more profitable company, so why shouldn't they pay more? It's all about the market, supply and demand. If people are willing to work for $13-$24/hr, why increase it? (From the company's perspective, not yours) Why should any company be expected/required to pay the same as a competitor? Their prices would be the same if all else was equal, and who loses? The customer.
If all it takes to get your loyalty back is for Fred to buy it, well that pretty much shows where your motivation lies. I think you have more integrity than that.
Very well said.
Thank you.![]()
i think for $74 dollars a month for protection not bad.At that point you can hand over your paycheck as well - the teamsters do need to party!
i think for $74 dollars a month for protection not bad.
i think for $74 dollars a month for protection not bad.
Yeah thats lame and wrong.FedEx is the only one profiting from its workers..