So several months ago I started pondering time travel and all the implications that would go along with it. The biggest one I considered was that if one was to to travel to another point in time, would they:
A. Take on a first-person perspective of themselves at that time, and would they exist at their age at that point in time or stay the same age as when they entered travel? And if they took on their original age at that point in time, would they retain all the memory and knowledge they had upon entering travel and have full autonomy over themselves? Or would they lose it all and would they repeat the same actions they did historically?
Movie: About Time
Family trait amongst males, can travel back within their timelines at will. Good movie, does a good job of exploring implications.
Also TV show: Quantum Leap
Main character could travel back within his timeline by exchanging consciousnessses with other people.
If you were caught in a time loop, unable to remember things, like everyone but Bill Murray in Groundhog day, you wouldn't recognize that you were. Perhaps we all are.
OR
B. Take on a third-person perspective, and be able to observe a version of themselves from another point in time in action.
Any movie which builds a machine that transports you to a particular point in time.
My take is that if you built a time machine and went back in time, it's because that is always what happened. There was no past where you didn't exist in that period, the action you take in that time will have always happened. Most likely you will be the person who caused the event that you wish to go back and change.
Creating alternate timelines is the same as creating alternate universes. 1.21 Gigawatts, or jigawatts, is simply not enough energy to create an entirely new universe. Which leads to my next point, the only real way you could time travel (since I'm not convinced that time exists as its own dimension) is if you had enough power and had a device that could arrange every bit of matter in the universe to the point in time you wish to travel to. This would require the energy to not only stop the motion of every planet, star and galaxy, but to move every single atom to the point in space it existed at that time, then reset the motion of every body in the universe back on their original relative trajectories, speeds and spins. That kind of energy would have to come from outside the universe, and you would have to have a machine not only capable of moving the heavenly bodies, but also capable on making the infinite calculations needed to set everything back to where it was. If you were capable of creating such a thing, I don't know that there would be any way to distinguish between it and the idea of God.
In addition to this, other considerations I made included:
- If time travel were possible, would it only be possible to go back and not forward, since technically it's impossible to observe what has not yet been done, and anything that has been observed is already in the past. And with that being said, would it be possible to return to the "present" after visiting the past?
We
are traveling forward in time. If we could create a stasis chamber, you could time travel ala Fry in Futurama. But you wouldn't be able to go back unless the professor built you a time machine. I like their take on it, in that episode, where they went too far forward in time they had to keep going and let the universe loop.
- Observation and interaction. Observable light in space is old. Very old; with many of the stars you see actually being millions of years dead. So whether actually traveling in time is possible or not, theoretically what would the possibility be of "folding" your point in space to simply observe the past, as the light continues to travel on.
Superman comics did a story line based on this, back in the 70's or 80's. Superman wanted to learn more about Krypton so he built a machine that could pick up the light reflected off of Krypton before it exploded and translate it into viewable video.
I like this idea of being able to look back and see what actually happened, at different points in history.
I don't know. There's a lot involved. And I'm sure many more implications I never even thought to consider. Though I'm willing to discuss any thoughtful takes on the subject.