Trump's ex-Chief of Staff Mark Meadows granted immunity
- Thread starter newolddude
- Start date
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
"Real People" sell access to their politician brother then wire him that money on the same day. Lol.
The hoops you cultists will jump through to defend dear supreme leader potato joe and his crime family.... Hilarious!
oldngray
nowhere special
Was ABC Caught Lying About Mark Meadows Turning On President Trump? * 100PercentFedUp.com * by Daniel
Whenever a large story breaks, it’s easy to see the big picture, but sometimes the fine details take a while […]
100percentfedup.com
One he said for a book deal, the other he said under oath. Which is more convincing?
And that’s why Mark flipped.
oldngray
nowhere special
ABC reported one thing. CBS said the opposite. Who should you believe?
Do you believe Meadows would have been granted immunity if he didn’t have the testimony the prosecution wanted against Donald Trump?Was ABC Caught Lying About Mark Meadows Turning On President Trump? * 100PercentFedUp.com * by Daniel
Whenever a large story breaks, it’s easy to see the big picture, but sometimes the fine details take a while […]
oldngray
nowhere special
Was he granted immunity? Meadows lawyer said he wasn't.
Do you believe the liberal media's reporting on anything concerning Trump is always fair, balanced, and accurate?
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Rational people see both are equally unconvincing.
People suffering from TDS on the other hand...
Babagounj
Strength through joy
Special Counsel Jack Smith Continues Lawfare Operation With More Leaks to ABC, This Time Claiming Mark Meadows Warned Trump About 2020 Election Result Being Accurate - The Last Refuge
Too many people continue falling for this Lawfare nonsense. CTH has been outlining what Lawfare operations are all about since we deconstructed the Trayvon Martin narrative. Perhaps a reminder is useful. Lawfare, in its most obvious construct, is not a legal approach per se’, it is the...
theconservativetreehouse.com
Lawfare, in its most obvious construct, is not a legal approach per se’, it is the intentional manipulation of the legal system to create the optics around information that is intended to be used by media to influence public opinion.
Remember, on August 21st, in another ridiculous Lawfare operation, Special Counsel Jack Smith told ABC that Mark Meadows testified that President Trump never attempted to declassify any information. That report was transparently false, yet the media ran with it and multiple alternative media promoted it. Pure nonsense.
Now remember, Mark Meadows wrote about the rigged and stolen 2020 election in his book, so why would he undermine his own story by saying something completely the opposite to Jack Smith that is only coming out now? The Occam’s razor answer is, he didn’t. This lawfare story is all made up, fictitious, anonymous sources, manufactured to create a public impression.
We'll see what's made up and what isn't when this all finally ends up in court.Special Counsel Jack Smith Continues Lawfare Operation With More Leaks to ABC, This Time Claiming Mark Meadows Warned Trump About 2020 Election Result Being Accurate - The Last Refuge
Too many people continue falling for this Lawfare nonsense. CTH has been outlining what Lawfare operations are all about since we deconstructed the Trayvon Martin narrative. Perhaps a reminder is useful. Lawfare, in its most obvious construct, is not a legal approach per se’, it is the...
Lawfare, in its most obvious construct, is not a legal approach per se’, it is the intentional manipulation of the legal system to create the optics around information that is intended to be used by media to influence public opinion.
Remember, on August 21st, in another ridiculous Lawfare operation, Special Counsel Jack Smith told ABC that Mark Meadows testified that President Trump never attempted to declassify any information. That report was transparently false, yet the media ran with it and multiple alternative media promoted it. Pure nonsense.
Now remember, Mark Meadows wrote about the rigged and stolen 2020 election in his book, so why would he undermine his own story by saying something completely the opposite to Jack Smith that is only coming out now? The Occam’s razor answer is, he didn’t. This lawfare story is all made up, fictitious, anonymous sources, manufactured to create a public impression.
Babagounj
Strength through joy
So Mark Meadows is willing to go to prison when he is caught lying for Jack Smith? Meadows took a plea deal that is basically a nonsense document because either way he’s friend ‘ d? Why?Special Counsel Jack Smith Continues Lawfare Operation With More Leaks to ABC, This Time Claiming Mark Meadows Warned Trump About 2020 Election Result Being Accurate - The Last Refuge
Too many people continue falling for this Lawfare nonsense. CTH has been outlining what Lawfare operations are all about since we deconstructed the Trayvon Martin narrative. Perhaps a reminder is useful. Lawfare, in its most obvious construct, is not a legal approach per se’, it is the...
Lawfare, in its most obvious construct, is not a legal approach per se’, it is the intentional manipulation of the legal system to create the optics around information that is intended to be used by media to influence public opinion.
Remember, on August 21st, in another ridiculous Lawfare operation, Special Counsel Jack Smith told ABC that Mark Meadows testified that President Trump never attempted to declassify any information. That report was transparently false, yet the media ran with it and multiple alternative media promoted it. Pure nonsense.
Now remember, Mark Meadows wrote about the rigged and stolen 2020 election in his book, so why would he undermine his own story by saying something completely the opposite to Jack Smith that is only coming out now? The Occam’s razor answer is, he didn’t. This lawfare story is all made up, fictitious, anonymous sources, manufactured to create a public impression.
I don’t see how his book holds any weight for you folks. All the republicans in Washington knew Trump had lost and we’re not shy about saying it…until they were. Trump and his moronic team came up with a crazy stunt to steal the election and try to gaslight democrats. Suddenly republicans stepped back in-line and took up “the big lie”. What’s an elected republican to do? Campaign on it!! Raise money off it!! Write a book about it!!!
Of course it all looks flimsy in two dimensions. But in time we’ll get to see the emails, text messages, memos and hear the recorded phone calls. Because there’s no way Meadows got immunity based on his word alone because that’s obviously worthless. But when he says the election wasn’t stolen and “the big lie” is a lie, there will be evidence to back up those words.
And it makes sense. In MTG’s own words, “If they can go after Trump, they can come after all of us!” Yes, Marjorie. That’s right. Too bad you didn’t get that pardon you were begging for.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
And if he did?
You are suggesting he didn’t get immunity from prosecution?
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
No you're suggesting he didn't get immunity for testimony, he got it for providing smoking gun evidence.
It's an interesting conspiracy theory you've got, but if you're wrong it would seem to prove fat Fanny is just a dumb diversity hire who is failing to get felony convictions she never should have brought in the first place.
But we'll wait and see how your BlueAnon theories play out. Carry on.
BrownFlush
Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
burrheadd
KING Of GIFS
He’s your presidential candidate
Get used to it
Similar threads
