32 hrs for 40 ain’t happening
Yep. 4 day’s work for 5 days pay. They’re crazy.How does that work?
They give everyone 8 hrs free every week?
This place has some Union...Not many union car salesmen
judging by the parking lot when walking in to work, $80,000 trucks are pretty easy to sell. Much of it has to do with the price I’m sure $80,000 trucks are not easy to sell.
The UAW is playing games by shutting down plants that supply key components to, say, an engine....that goes into a car....that gets paint.....that gets shipped....that goes to a dealer, etc...No, my point is only a few of the plants are shut down. Which to me doesn’t seem like too big a deal as the company has been shutting down plants left and right for a couple weeks here in there for months. I guess we will see.
Nice. The country is heading to a tipping point.The UAW is playing games by shutting down plants that supply key components to, say, an engine....that goes into a car....that gets paint.....that gets shipped....that goes to a dealer, etc...
I think the 40% increase basically gets them up to what we’re making or slightly more, certainly they’re going to get a pretty good raise. I have no idea about the 32 hour work week seems like that’s gonna be a tough one.
Please put the crack pipe downI believe the concept of working 32 hours but getting paid for 40 is something very feasible in the near future, and UAW is in the right industry to advocate for it. I see this as achievable through the EV product line and automation. Both these factors allow for staffing reduction without negatively affecting production. Additionally, natural staffing attrition, such as retirements, resignations, and terminations, would work in both parties' favor. When an employee leaves, their position wouldn't be filled until staffing reaches the right size.
Overall, this approach would lead to a reduction in headcount and utilize a portion of the savings generated by automation and less labor-intensive products like EVs. This could likely cover the costs of the 32/40 plan.
This is going to make the jacked automobile market much worse.
Disconcerting!
Sure but I do not think that is what most people who are fighting for that want. That is what corporations want.I believe the concept of working 32 hours but getting paid for 40 is something very feasible in the near future, and UAW is in the right industry to advocate for it. I see this as achievable through the EV product line and automation. Both these factors allow for staffing reduction without negatively affecting production. Additionally, natural staffing attrition, such as retirements, resignations, and terminations, would work in both parties' favor. When an employee leaves, their position wouldn't be filled until staffing reaches the right size.
Overall, this approach would lead to a reduction in headcount and utilize a portion of the savings generated by automation and less labor-intensive products like EVs. This could likely cover the costs of the 32/40 plan.
They need to fight for job securitySure but I do not think that is what most people who are fighting for that want. That is what corporations want.
A job is not a welfare program.They need to fight for job security
Well maybe just give her the part-time supervisors because that seems like a welfare program to meA job is not a welfare program.
32 hours, 4 days, same thing. They want 3 days off. Not happening.Are they definitely asking for 32 hour workweek? Or four day workweek?
Not really. Maybe they are asking for a "four-ten" workweek.32 hours, 4 days, same thing.