bigbrownhen
Well-Known Member
Whew, glad I don't wear any perfume. Haven't in years. Just my deodorant is all I need. I'd tell you the kind but its a secret...
If I lived anywhere near the Gulf of Mexico, I'd quit seafood too.
Whew, glad I don't wear any perfume. Haven't in years. Just my deodorant is all I need. I'd tell you the kind but its a secret...
There is nothing wrong with native peoples hunting whales for sustenance.
I dont believe that the native boats were equipped with diesel engines, sonar and explosive-tipped harpoons though.
Or rifles.
Re: Whale Wars
Originally Posted by soberups
There is nothing wrong with native peoples hunting whales for sustenance.
I dont believe that the native boats were equipped with diesel engines, sonar and explosive-tipped harpoons though.
Point taken.
The natives, however, weren't limited to a single three-week hunting season for the entire year. And they werent required to only take mature buck deer or bull elk with a minimum number of antler points. They killed and ate whatever game they came across. Same deal with fishing, they didnt have stream closures or daily limits on the type or number of fish that could be taken.
If the Sea Shepherds were truly serious about putting an end to the whaling, they would ditch the non-violent tactics and start using brute force.
The world arms market is awash with perfectly servicible Eastern-Bloc surplus weaponry such as the RPG's and AK-47's that are used by the Somali pirates as well as insurgents and rebels everywhere.
If a bunch of Yemeni terrorists were able to take out a US Navy destroyer using a remote-control speedboat packed with explosives, there is no reason that the Sea Shepherds couldn't do the same thing against an unarmed Japanese fishing boat.
It would definately make for higher ratings then continuing to bombard the fishing boats with stink bombs.