100 Billion in revenue is total of UPS revenue, including all of our other offerings such as Intl, supply chain, brokerage etc. These are areas the teamsters are not related too. I don't think we'd have to hire that many. The lion's share of people live paycheck to paycheck. Too many people in their 20's and 30's and even 40's don't have a sizable emergency fund. Too many people have a large mortgage, and expensive payments for their cars, tuition to save\pay for their kids etc. The people most vociferous are the older hard core teamsters who while talking tough, also is taking 2-4 weeks of vacation during the beginning of August, so while they are preaching solidarity, they aren't losing one paycheck from UPS since they already received it as a vacation check. That's what the high seniority people did in 97. They also are at the point where their house is paid off and they can afford to miss paychecks. A strike will hurt UPS but it will also hurt a lot of UPSers, both union and non-union. If a strike last a long time let's say 13 weeks. How many people will be in serious financial trouble? I think that Carol will try to offer a good benefit and pay package. However, I see her being ruthless if the teamsters strike. Just my opinion. As to the pension and health contribution going to trusts, fair enough. What happens to those trusts when they aren't infused with money from UPS? they will run out of money and not afford to pay the bills. Some supplements get money based on "hours Paid" per week with a max of 40 hours. So if a strike occurs, those funds will permanently lose money coming into them. Yet, they still have their obligations to pay. As it is, most union pension funds are underfunded by a sizable margin. Imagine with income drying up.