dBoy said:Leme see if I have this correct. For an on the job injury that you pay for, UPS pays 70 and you pay 30. Now if UPS decides that they will pay for it all, then they pay themselves back the 70 and send you a check for 30?
Not always true. If the doctor says the flair up is from your old injury that you never kept open(case) they can deny you coverage and will.dannyboy said:Now, if you re injured a former comp injury, that would be a new claim and not an extension of the old claim.
d
susiedriver said:dBoy,
To find someone who is 'less than honest' in their posting, one would have to look no further than you.
Not always true. If the doctor says the flair up is from your old injury that you never kept open(case) they can deny you coverage and will.
Example: Say you hurt your back and comp quack says "oh it's just a strain there's nothing we can do for you" and sends you back to work,then after say 2 years it's gotten so bad you can't take it anymore and see a different comp doc (A better one)and he says it's not a strain it's something worse you need surgery,Liberty can tell you sorry we've closed that case,can't help you.Then UPS says "oh your on light duty(doc gives you restrictions) sorry we have no TAW for you go home until your released" Trust me this scenario can happen
dannyboy said:There is a difference between a flair up and a re-injury. If the doctor says it is a flair up (read re-injury) of an injury that was originally listed as workers comp, then it should either be covered like the old one was, or a new injury report needs to be filed. And if they refuse, then get the information from the doc and get a lawyer.
In the first example with the quack it is the first injury. And he sends you back as a strained back. The the second one says it is something worse and it will take surgery, then that should be treated as a different injury or be covered under the first injury as a misdiagnosis.
The same happened to me. It was diagnosed as a strain for several months. Then after nothing got better, it was re diagnosed as a compound lateral tear.
Now, in that same scenario you painted, you say that "say after two years it has gotten so bad you cant take it any more" you are correct and they would be correct in not paying you comp.
You see, what you dont understand is that you only get comp if there is one moment in one day that causes your problem. If you have that one moment that you can say "I twisted to get the box under the shelf and I heard a pop or felt it tear" then in this case you would have a comp claim.
But if in fact you have a long term problem that just keeps getting worse over time, and one day you decide you cant take it any more, that is not nor has it ever been a comp claim.
There are examples that I know of that do not follow this but for the most part they do.
So you are comparing apples with oranges.
Now my question for you is this. Why would a driver have a back injury that is bothering him for two years not go back to the comp doc and at least get something for the inflammation or pain if it is really bothering him? That way the case stays open, and shows a continuing problem that has not properly healed.
So in this case, if it is a problem that is indeed from the original injury, the driver shot themselves in the foot by not going to the doc for help. But since the problem has steadily gotten worse, he now no longer qualifies for comp.
d
In the first example with the quack it is the first injury. And he sends you back as a strained back. The the second one says it is something worse and it will take surgery, then that should be treated as a different injury or be covered under the first injury as a misdiagnosis.
This is also not true,what if you work the entire day go home then wake up feeling hurt? I have had this happen to me and told them I don't know when during the day it happened,they paid.You see, what you dont understand is that you only get comp if there is one moment in one day that causes your problem. If you have that one moment that you can say "I twisted to get the box under the shelf and I heard a pop or felt it tear" then in this case you would have a comp claim.
Hurt on job,doc misdiagnosis you get to where now you can't physically do the job,it's still the same injury that created the problem from the start.But if in fact you have a long term problem that just keeps getting worse over time, and one day you decide you cant take it any more, that is not nor has it ever been a comp claim.
Yes but what if the first doc said there's nothing that can be done for you,it will always hurt(but never get worse).So in this case, if it is a problem that is indeed from the original injury, the driver shot themselves in the foot by not going to the doc for help.
tieguy said:Whew had a terrible nightmare. Dreamed the our liberal {deleted by moderator} susie was back posting under her ID. But a quick phone call to the DNC confirmed that susie was still slaving away under Kerrys desk.
dannyboy said:Agreed. And that is why I suggested that even though they are somewhat an evil, get a lawyer. Anytime you are injured on the job and Liberty and UPS with the docs in a box run you around, get a lawyer.
Something else that has not been mentioned. For all injuries, UPS can not tell you who to see. They must give you at least two providers to choose from. And on back injuries, there must be three with one being a chiropractor. So if you are not given at least two providers to choose from, post back and we will tell you how to proceed.
An interesting tidbit. Driver has been driving for 8-10 years, was a football player during highschool and some past highschool. Knees were all to hell because of the game. He ends up with two knee replacements paid for by workers comp. And lifetime medical on the knees to boot.
So how does that fit into the rules that have been set up for UPS and liberty to follow?
d
That's what I tell these guys that get hurt and they say "nah don't need that UPS will take care of me"and for the most part they do but there is always one who gets burned.And that is why I suggested that even though they are somewhat an evil, get a lawyer. Anytime you are injured on the job and Liberty and UPS with the docs in a box run you around, get a lawyer.
An interesting tidbit. Driver has been driving for 8-10 years, was a football player during highschool and some past highschool. Knees were all to hell because of the game. He ends up with two knee replacements paid for by workers comp. And lifetime medical on the knees to boot.
So how does that fit into the rules that have been set up for UPS and liberty to follow?
tieguy said:Cheryl ,
Its your board to do with as you wish but if I may offer an opinion I believe you moderation efforts should also include the term tiegay which is horribly offensive to our gay posters here.
Susie did cross the line with the stalking stuff... I will take your opinion into consideration tie...tieguy said:Cheryl ,
Its your board to do with as you wish but if I may offer an opinion I believe you moderation efforts should also include the term tiegay which is horribly offensive to our gay posters here. Keep in mind that phrase was posted here on this thread unprovoked before I had posted one blurb on this thread.
I would also like to respectfully ask why someone who's actions bordered on criminal stalking is being allowed to post here. I'm not completely comfortable with a person exhibiting such criminal insanity being allowed to post here. After all she did show a clear effort to stalk and attempt to intimidate a poster she disagreed with. What will she do next time?
As a rule I don't like to ban people. There is a new feature in the upcoming software upgrade that has an infraction procedure. It provides new levels of accountability which will allow moderator approval of all posts from users that find it difficult to participate without being offensive. From what I have been told it will be a few weeks until it is out of beta and ready to install here.dannyboy said:Not that I have a horse in the race, but banning is a slippery slope.
dannyboy said:Not that I have a horse in the race, but banning is a slippery slope.
And while this is a great board, full of good ideas and super people seeking to help each other out, sometimes things get carried away and get too personal. Unfortunatly, I have allowed myself to be lowered to that extreme as well, but I shall endevour never to allow it again.
If a mistake was made, give it a slap on the hands and let it go. If the same mistake keep getting made, then there is a problem that needs to be dealt with.
d