its just not your place.......its everywhere!!Every building is different, brother. Where I am, just in the last 6, 7 years the difference in attitude and morale in the workplace is palpable.
To those who didn't vote.... According to the official ups teamster website ONLY 35 percent of us teamsters returned the ballots before the other 3 locals are collected. Everyone is entitled to your own opinion on how you chose to vote. I personally voted no. If you voted yes, it was your right to, the same goes to the no voters. I just don't understand how somebody could be so lazy and not vote. All you had to do is check the box you chose and placed the cards back into 2 envelopes. It was prepaid as well!! It wouldn't have cost you a penny. Whenever the total is counted and it doesn't come out the way you wanted... Blame yourself!! You had a chance to change an outcome.
If you did vote yes/no, then thank you for being a brother/sister and having a voice.
Dear God.....................I hope that was a bad attempt at a joke%&*&&^%$#If Teamsters & UPS wanted more people to vote, they wouldn't have made the ballot so difficult to understand and inconvenient. I got confused with the tear here part, are we supposed to mail in three different envelopes? i only received one. Plus having to Search for an USPS drop box and risk loosing our vote in the USPS mailing system is also an inconvenience. should be a ballot drop box @ the hub. Voting should also be held @ our Hubs.
You'd think with sooo much technology, voting would be done online instead
Thanks,
Loyal Teamster
If Teamsters & UPS wanted more people to vote, they wouldn't have made the ballot so difficult to understand and inconvenient. I got confused with the tear here part, are we supposed to mail in three different envelopes? i only received one. Plus having to Search for an USPS drop box and risk loosing our vote in the USPS mailing system is also an inconvenience. should be a ballot drop box @ the hub. Voting should also be held @ our Hubs.
You'd think with sooo much technology, voting would be done online instead
Thanks,
Loyal Teamster
If Teamsters & UPS wanted more people to vote, they wouldn't have made the ballot so difficult to understand and inconvenient. I got confused with the tear here part, are we supposed to mail in three different envelopes? i only received one. Plus having to Search for an USPS drop box and risk loosing our vote in the USPS mailing system is also an inconvenience. should be a ballot drop box @ the hub. Voting should also be held @ our Hubs.
You'd think with sooo much technology, voting would be done online instead
Thanks,
Loyal Teamster
Where is your big spoon?Electronic chads
Where is your big spoon?
I guess a chad sticking out.....is better than something else sticking outAll gummed up with chads!
Chads sticking out all over the place.
It's because the PTers have better things to do. Like fantasize about LeBron James and the Miami Heat.
UPS has taught the new wave of PTers not to care pretty well it seems.
Employment profiling.... cheap shot. I'm a part timer and I did 3 days of research, when my ballot came it was stamped and in the mailbox the same day.
What UPS had taught me, is that our union isn't as strong as it used to be, and if they want, they can bully us. They have been, our PT steward stepped down 4 months ago, and our full time steward stepped down 2 months ago. He was a hero, didn't give a damn about anything would go into managements office and let them know what's up. We now have no representation. General Consensus = delegate in bed with management.
Part time votedI believe that the only Part-Timers that voted are the ones who cares, the one who want a career in UPS like myself.
People profile for a reason. I'm also PT, and I spoke with hundreds of PTers within my facility encouraging them to vote, but it was obvious most were more interested in LeBron James. If the number I'm hearing for my local is indeed accurate, if every PTer within my Preload voted, it would constitute 60% of my locals votes (and would also mean many voted YES, which is unlikely). The actual vote return was probably less than 5%. Absolutely pathetic.
And it's hard to convince me our union isn't strong when the average FT, performing menial work, will be earning $94,000/year with no-cost health & welfare benefits. That's beyond the average income of somebody with an M.B.A., and is absolutely baffling. What happened is that the PTers choose once again to not get involved, so the union was
forced to design a contract the incumbent FTers would pass - using PTers to subsidize the FT wage yet again.