Who did he baptize?
He also baptized Jesus.The Scripture says:
1)John the Baptist preached only to Jews, and John baptized only Jews. We read that all of John's ministry was done only in a land that was inhabited by Jews (Matt. 3:5-6)
Romans 10:9 actually says:Romans 10:9 says ONLY confession will save.
If the first is true, the second doesn't matter.JESUS IS MY SAVIOR
TRUMP IS MY PRESIDENT
I affirm you have no idea which baptism Peter was speaking of.So you affirm the English word for, translated from the the Greek word eis, is "because of " and not "for."
OK
Just for the record, the preposition used for "on account of" or "because of" is the Greek word "dia". It is no where to be found in the text we are discussing.
The Greek word in the original manuscript in Acts 2:38 is "eis" , "for", "in order to"
You never touched it. It is totally opposite of what you claimed with nothing but a claim.So you affirm the English word for, translated from the the Greek word eis, is "because of " and not "for."
OK
Just for the record, the preposition used for "on account of" or "because of" is the Greek word "dia". It is no where to be found in the text we are discussing.
The Greek word in the original manuscript in Acts 2:38 is "eis" , "for", "in order to"
Here's the way it goes, if eis is the Greek that was translated, it does not mean because of.@floridays You keep bringing up new material and inject spin and copying and pasting the Bible without even recognizing what I answered prior. The idea is ( I thought) was to come to some sort of conclusion about what the Bible actually teaches with what you have tossed out as fact.
Example:
You never touched it.
I'll continue to answer your questions and injections one at a time. If someone is following they will have an easier time and it will be less confusing.
You're all over the place. Focus.
It wasn't John's baptism . It wasn't Holy Spirit ( HS baptism is not for the remission of sins) It was water baptism for the remission of sins. V38.. More on this as time passes.I affirm you have no idea which baptism Peter was speaking of.
How about scripture when you divide? You offer none.In my dividing of the word, water has never washed sin away, Peter was not speaking of the picture, the seen, he was speaking of the real, the unseen.
Yet, plenty more material and injection to be addressed. So much material to answer and address.I will definitely address this false teaching maybe early:Big deal, that only meant Peter was speaking of a different baptism, the baptism John foretold of. Peter knew sins were not washed away by immersion in water.
Explain Simon the sorcerer, he was baptized, yet had no place.
Do you think Judas was baptized?
You handle the word for your benefit, I will divide it as the spirit of God reveals it.
I have not copied and pasted anything except the scripture from the King James Version, period.
I said it before, I'll say it again, You trust your sins being washed away with water, I'll trust only the blood of Jesus to wash away my sin.
You are no 40 year bible scholar, for 40 years you have been regurgitating the teaching of your denomination. Period.
I have dealt with your questions, maybe not in the manner you prefer, or gave the response required by you.
Easy question for you, because of your need to tell truth.
Why did you lie about the copy and paste @Integrity questioned you about, and why did you lie about the text of Romans 10:9 ?
Simple questions, you have no need to refer to any reference material to answer these.
Again, you back with zero Bible, just making a claim doesn't make it so. You keep bouncing all over the place.Here's the way it goes, if eis is the Greek that was translated, it does not mean because of.
Big deal, that only meant Peter was speaking of a different baptism, the baptism John foretold of. Peter knew sins were not washed away by immersion in water.
Why did you lie about the copy and paste @Integrity questioned you about, and why did you lie about the text of Romans 10:9 ?
Simple questions, you have no need to refer to any reference material to answer these.
You are no 40 year bible scholar, for 40 years you have been regurgitating the teaching of your denomination. Period.
Liar? lolWhy did you lie about the text of Romans 10:9 ?
I don't.You promote the remission of sins through water.
I do also.I believe in the remission, the washing of sin by blood.
A bible fact.A man baptizes you in to the water
Scripture?The Holy Spirit baptizes me in the Blood of the Son of God.
He never had any sins when he went down into the water.How many sins did Jesus leave in the water?
He was very hesitant to baptize Jesus. ( Rightly so, this is the Son of God approaching ) He felt so unworthy.What did John say when his Lord and his God appeared to be baptized, in water?
Hallelujah, hallelujah, hallelujah.I pray for the continued realization that God has everything I need. I pray that I may always remember that His power is always available.
This was the answer I was looking for.Jesus was baptized to fulfill all scripture
What are you inferring?This was the answer I was looking for.
It was not my reasoning.Liar? lol
Simply using your own reasoning.
Romans 10:91 Peter 3:21 says ONLY baptism saves.
Luke 13:3 says ONLY repentance will save .
Romans 10:9 says ONLY confession will save.
None of these passages have believe in them.
What now?
More fodder.It was not my reasoning.
Romans 10:9
9That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
Why did you say this passage did not have believe in it?
I inferred nothing, I merely stated what I was looking for.What are you inferring?