Browndriver5
Well-Known Member
Would it not be cheaper for UPS to just add routes instead of having half the building filing 9.5 grievances? It makes no sense
Paying the 9.5 grievances may still be cheaper than the cost of adding someone in FT AND paying for their benefits. The benefits is the kicker in the equation.
FT pension contribution is going to be higher.Not if youre already paying part timers in the building those same benefits
FT pension contribution is going to be higher.
If we didn't have awesome benefits and pension contributions on top of the $50/hr then you'd be right on.Would it not be cheaper for UPS to just add routes instead of having half the building filing 9.5 grievances? It makes no sense
Why don't just do your time it is part of your job.
What job do you have with the company?Why don't just do your time it is part of your job.
What job do you have with the company?
Would it not be cheaper for UPS to just add routes instead of having half the building filing 9.5 grievances? It makes no sense
No.Would it not be cheaper for UPS to just add routes instead of having half the building filing 9.5 grievances? It makes no sense
If a part timer goes full time who takes their spot?Not if youre already paying part timers in the building those same benefits
No.
How many times do we need to go over this.