Abortion
- Thread starter Overpaid Union Thug
- Start date
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
That’s why I asked the question, how many eight-month old healthy fetuses are aborted?
You respond with some gibberish article that throws around undefined terms.
Cheers, I’ll get back to you.
Covemastah
Hoopah drives the boat Chief !!
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
Here’s a cursory search, it will take a little attention to get through, I assume you’re up to the task...
How many late term abortions are really performed in the United States?
I’m going through more links, but they all basically say the same thing:
97% ~ of the time, if an abortion is performed after 24 weeks, it’s because something’s wrong with the viability of the fetus.
Ok champ, you show me some data where people are having ‘elective’ abortions past 24 weeks with a healthy fetus.
(You can’t).
How many late term abortions are really performed in the United States?
I’m going through more links, but they all basically say the same thing:
97% ~ of the time, if an abortion is performed after 24 weeks, it’s because something’s wrong with the viability of the fetus.
Ok champ, you show me some data where people are having ‘elective’ abortions past 24 weeks with a healthy fetus.
(You can’t).
Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
You seem to be missing the point that the discussion is not about whether or not third trimester abortions take place.
The point is that a new proposed law would allow abortions to occur up to and including during a full-term birth.
Why is the law written that way if no one will do it?
Furthermore, you are a man ... it ain't none of your business.
F
Frankie's Friend
Guest
If you Google the article above or any late term abortion stats you can easily see that it is 20 weeks and beyond.
Do I have to do your work for you?
"Due date" as you attached to your statement about doubting many if any are killed close to that "deadline" is fluid.
Really.
I have a relative that got toxemia during two of her pregnancies and her children were "born" at 3 lbs (roughly) and incubated until they could go home.
If they werent taken early they could've died so their "due date" was at about 20 weeks.
They're 3 yrs apart in age and healthy children. In fact they're pretty ornery healthy.
The difference is they had a mom (who almost went blind due to toxemia) who loved her children (not fetuses) enough to hold on until they could survive without her.
Last edited by a moderator:
F
Frankie's Friend
Guest
Do you know what is more sick and deranged than the murdering of tiny defenceless children?
Being so calloused of heart that it doesnt mean much to us anymore. We can just look the other way. Forget about it. And you know why?
Their screams are never heard.
It's like catching and filleting a fish.
The pain of their butchering is never known unless you have watched it on film.
We have become a nation of professional barbarians.
Being so calloused of heart that it doesnt mean much to us anymore. We can just look the other way. Forget about it. And you know why?
Their screams are never heard.
It's like catching and filleting a fish.
The pain of their butchering is never known unless you have watched it on film.
We have become a nation of professional barbarians.
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
Again, show me some statistics where absolutely healthy fetuses at 24 weeks + are aborted.
That was my point all along.
Good for your relative that didn’t choose abortion, glad it worked out.
Again, explain to me where there’s a likely or even possible scenario where a healthy 24+ week old fetus has ever been aborted?
You can’t, because it never happens.
We’re arguing against ourselves.
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
You’re right, it’s none of my business.
So actual numbers mean nothing to you? 1 is 1 too many.
Never? Why then did New York create such a law? And I believe what is in question in the new law is the health of the mother, not the viability of the baby.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Fake
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
FFS, stop with your militant ideology.
You’re apoplectic about the unborn, but once they’re actually born, you don’t give a ....
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
They didn't.
You're gullible.
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
Cheers, nine times out of ten, I’ll side with the mother.
You say it like it’s a bad thing, it’s not.
F
Frankie's Friend
Guest
I reported it as 20 plus weeks not 24.
Start there. Then to answer your #s question google this...
Sorry my device won't post thumbnails.
I'm not arguing this redundant issue further.
Who cares what percentage of children are destroyed in the last few weeks.
Any living children put to death is failure for a so called "civilized society".
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Fake
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
fixed it for you
BrownFlush
Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
of coarse you did
