Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
You’re the poster child!IGNORANCE.
You’re the poster child!IGNORANCE.
Says the guy posting gore.
If you don't want an abortion, don't have one. There's plenty of totally fake pictures out there of "abortions" that were stillbirths. Here's one for you Bible-Bangers. Why does Jesus kill babies in the womb. You know, stillbirths, miscarriages etc.? I thought God only dealt in perfection. Is it better to let a child be born that is going to die minutes after birth anyways from some horrific birth defect, or keep it alive and suffering?
IGNORANCE.
OK so let's put in this way. In light of the fact that the new budget proposal submitted by the Trump administration calls for steep cuts to social programs would you be willing to support a federal income tax surcharge or an increase in your state's income tax rate specifically targeted to pay for the support of countless numbers of unwanted and or insufficiently care for babies? And don't try to BS your way around the question. It comes down to a simple yes or no answer.Baby Trevor survived at 23 weeks; Planned Parenthood aborts at 24
Baby Trevor survived at 23 weeks; Planned Parenthood aborts at 24
I support free abortions for Blacks and Hispanics!OK so let's put in this way. In light of the fact that the new budget proposal submitted by the Trump administration calls for steep cuts to social programs would you be willing to support a federal income tax surcharge or an increase in your state's income tax rate specifically targeted to pay for the support of countless numbers of unwanted and or insufficiently care for babies? And don't try to BS your way around the question. It comes down to a simple yes or no answer.
The irony of his post about "baby trevor" is that the baby was in the hospital for over a year because it was completely incapable of surviving without constant medical treatment. Ask him what he thinks should happen to that baby if the parents couldn't afford that medical care and he will go silent.OK so let's put in this way. In light of the fact that the new budget proposal submitted by the Trump administration calls for steep cuts to social programs would you be willing to support a federal income tax surcharge or an increase in your state's income tax rate specifically targeted to pay for the support of countless numbers of unwanted and or insufficiently care for babies? And don't try to BS your way around the question. It comes down to a simple yes or no answer.
Severe restrictions or an outright ban on abortion altogether will invariably result is a dramatic increase in the demand for publicly funded child care support services in all forms . This at a time when the Trump administration proposes severe cuts in federal support for these services in an effort to dump the entire problem onto the states. That's real leadership. Dump the problem onto the states and let the next guy figure out what to do about it.The irony of his post about "baby trevor" is that the baby was in the hospital for over a year because it was completely incapable of surviving without constant medical treatment. Ask him what he thinks should happen to that baby if the parents couldn't afford that medical care and he will go silent.
A lot of things should be handled by the States. Read your Constitution.Severe restrictions or an outright ban on abortion altogether will invariably result is a dramatic increase in the demand for publicly funded child care support services in all forms . This at a time when the Trump administration proposes severe cuts in federal support for these services in an effort to dump the entire problem onto the states. That's real leadership. Dump the problem onto the states and let the next guy figure out what to do about it.
A lot of things should be handled by the States. Read your Constitution.
I said a lot of things, not everything. ttkuSure, slavery, woman's right to vote, etc.
Great argument.
OK so let's put in this way. In light of the fact that the new budget proposal submitted by the Trump administration calls for steep cuts to social programs would you be willing to support a federal income tax surcharge or an increase in your state's income tax rate specifically targeted to pay for the support of countless numbers of unwanted and or insufficiently care for babies? And don't try to BS your way around the question. It comes down to a simple yes or no answer.
Severe restrictions or an outright ban on abortion altogether will invariably result is a dramatic increase in the demand for publicly funded child care support services in all forms . This at a time when the Trump administration proposes severe cuts in federal support for these services in an effort to dump the entire problem onto the states. That's real leadership. Dump the problem onto the states and let the next guy figure out what to do about it.
A complete reversal coming from a guy who is always waaaing about being short changed when it comes to a return on his taxes.Yes for about the 10th time. , it's real easy stop supporting abortions and use the money to match babies with adoptive parents. You know there are families out there paying big money to adopt children?
Until the consercuks get out their wallets and stand ready and willing to bear the staggering additional child welfare costs an outright ban on abortion would incur little if anything regarding this matter at least at the federal level is going to change . In addition it would appear that going forward catholic charities will not be able to offer much assistance given the way they're selling off hard assets just to pay off clergy child abuse.It's cost effective to kill babies. Infanticide is profitable.
OK, build the wall, stop whole families from entering illegally, and from the money saved from the strain they were putting on our social services assist unwed mothers. However also put legal restraints on people just dumping their kids on the state, and legal penalties on backalley abortions, and soon people will change their behavior to be more responsible. Not to mention if people know they can't easily enter the U.S. there will be a lot less of them attempting to come up, thus a lot less getting raped, robbed, and murdered. A good thing all the way around.Until the consercuks get out their wallets and stand ready and willing to bear the staggering additional child welfare costs an outright ban on abortion would incur little if anything regarding this matter at least at the federal level is going to change . In addition it would appear that going forward catholic charities will not be able to offer much assistance given the way they're selling off hard assets just to pay off clergy child abuse.
If you're so pro life/ anti abortion........how come you've never adopted a kid?OK, build the wall, stop whole families from entering illegally, and from the money saved from the strain they were putting on our social services assist unwed mothers. However also put legal restraints on people just dumping their kids on the state, and legal penalties on backalley abortions, and soon people will change their behavior to be more responsible. Not to mention if people know they can't easily enter the U.S. there will be a lot less of them attempting to come up, thus a lot less getting raped, robbed, and murdered. A good thing all the way around.