And I'll ask you again.
Well regulated...militia...lol. The ATF is unconstitutional.
That is not what well regulated meant in the language usage when it was written. It meant trained. Not controlled by the government.
I'm saying, ad nauseum, that both sides participate in conspiracy theories. You're the one saying that the Left uses the term as a way to shut down what it is that we're saying they're doing. I'm saying that it's way beyond that. Overgrown children are being manipulated into believing conspiracy theories and have expressed their beliefs here on this forum. I get your point about the Left with all the QAnon BS. But that's not them on this forum going on about evil plans, etc etc, that are out in the twilight zone. That's a bunch of right leaning rubes here who are bored with the mundane fighting over taxes and spending and school boards and etc, etc, etc. No, they have to have the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse on the horizon. None of the usual problem solving. It's not poor people looking for work. Oh no no no, it's an eventual uprising where most of us are killed and the rest reeducated. Ridiculous.
And has been used in case law to set precedent and upheld by SCOTUS. Otherwise the ATF is a rogue agency with no real power.
SCOTUS has also ruled there are limits to the governments power
Sure have. Every time you guys don't get your way on something you declare the whole thing unconstitutional.
Apparently banning bump stocks was within their power.
And yet they exist. I think you should pack your satchel and head to Washington to argue your point before SCOTUS.
The SCOTUS refused to hear that case so didn't make a ruling on it.
Yes and there's only one party that is saying conspiracy theories are dangerous and we should shut down free speech.
I was saying 5 years ago that Russiagate was a made up conspiracy by the Left to much derision. And not a lot of support from many on the Right here. So frankly when I see people spouting about crazy conspiracies I have very little sympathy for them.
And they were banned. SCOTUS refusing to hear a case is confirming a lower court's ruling.
More them dodging the issue
Who on the right tried to use the government to shut down your right to say that?
Sorry, I didn't document it at the time.
With the same result. A lower court makes a ruling, and SCOTUS decides whether to take it up. If they don't the ruling stands.
