Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
I'm sure the poor guys will be slammed with work the rest of the yearI'm hoping to run into one of the freight drivers and asked them what happened.
I'm sure the poor guys will be slammed with work the rest of the yearI'm hoping to run into one of the freight drivers and asked them what happened.
I still haven't seen any freight trucks yet.I'm sure the poor guys will be slammed with work the rest of the year
Please feel free to explain what happened then.Cant wait to pull out that "balls disappeared" coment.
Kick rocks
It'll go from we don't have work we don't have any we don't have any work to ALL HANDS ON DECK.I still haven't seen any freight trucks yet.
Im sure you are confused, i have no question about that. But with this statement, you already have in idea in your mind, your own version what happened. So you can throw out the insults.I mean ups played the cards they had. The freight workers folded like a $5 tent.
I am confused about what there is to be mad about or talk about how you got screwed when 3 out of 4 people agreed it was a good contact.
Yes you do, remember, our balls disappeared.Please feel free to explain what happened then.
I'm ignorant to the situation. I don't know how you go from that big of a no to that big of a yes other than...
1) the contract getting a lot better
2) the first no vote was a bluff and no one was willing to take it any farther.
The thread title is asking if anyone heard about the freight contract. Why wouldn't I read it to see if anyone answered the op?Why would you go on a forum expecting your questions to get answered? The contract, (both of them) are all over the place. If you were really concerned with an answer, you would have looked over... at least one.
No, read my post to YOU. Im addressing YOU and your comments.The thread title is asking if anyone heard about the freight contract. Why wouldn't I read it to see if anyone answered the op?
Sure I could go to the tdu and read about it or I could just ask an actual freight employee.
You're obviously bitter about it all
You're an employee right? Did you flip from no to yes?Yes you do, remember, our balls disappeared.
Do some more reading on this forum... you might find the answer.
No, i wasnt no to yes.You're an employee right? Did you flip from no to yes?
What were your reasons?
That's all I'm asking. Reading all of the articles I want won't give me the answers as to why there was such a huge flip.
hence "their balls disappesred"Maybe, just maybe, instead of using balls, they used thier brains.
Listen, i have a thought of why they did, but its just speculation. If you have been here the years i have, (before the purchase) and seen and experienced what will be selectively enforced, and what they have withheld from us, you wouldnt be making some of these comments, and might understand a little about what happened. Im not going to speculate about what happened because i dont know.hence "their balls disappesred"
Hoffa Ratifies Another Weak Contract at UPS Freight
Of course tdu is anti Hoffa. So am I but blaming him for this is a huge stretch. I have no idea how him forcing the package contract made freight drivers vote yes.
Really, you still dont have any idea why?hence "their balls disappesred"
Hoffa Ratifies Another Weak Contract at UPS Freight
Of course tdu is anti Hoffa. So am I but blaming him for this is a huge stretch. I have no idea how him forcing the package contract made freight drivers vote yes.
Yes, and i guess that was something that had to be thought of long and hard about before a decision was made.I understand why they changed their mind but if in 2 3 4 years from now they will struggle to make a better life the next contract will be worse. Guess who blinked first. How many supervisor they would of laid off and paying unemployment to.
Please feel free to explain what happened then.
I'm ignorant to the situation. I don't know how you go from that big of a no to that big of a yes other than...
1) the contract getting a lot better
2) the first no vote was a bluff and no one was willing to take it any farther.
From what I read the huge concessionary language that was in the first offer was "enhanced" back to where it was in the old contract. Then there were raises added and some other issues corrected that made the second offer "better" or more acceptable to the members.Yes, and i guess that was something that had to be thought of long and hard about before a decision was made.
Why would you go on a forum expecting your questions to get answered? The contract, (both of them) are all over the place. If you were really concerned with an answer, you would have looked over... at least one.