LagunaBrown
Well-Known Member
You are just not getting it.Saturday air is Saturday delivery.
Intent and $5 will get you a bag of chips and a Coke.
You are just not getting it.Saturday air is Saturday delivery.
Intent and $5 will get you a bag of chips and a Coke.
In my interpretation/reading/understanding whatever you want to call it. the total number of protected jobs will be the number of routes in Monday-Friday. The lowest number being Monday for my building. Therefore the number on Monday will be the number protected!
Basically you get the total RPCD and they are protected jobs. Now how many routes do you run on Saturday and how many RPCD are in you center?Devil's advocate here, what building does not have Sat air? So even if XYZ center has not begun the "regular Saturday delivery" cluster that many of us know does the phrase, "in the event the company does not begin Saturday or Sunday delivery at a building until after August 1, 2018" even apply?
Not true because no 22.4 can work if a RPCD is laid off.It's the number of drivers CURRENTLY scheduled M-friend, has nothing to do with routes in, and does not protect the positions MOVING BACK to M-friend. The drivers are protected, but not the jobs.
Ex: 10 drivers M-friend, 6 drivers T-S. All 16 will eventually be working M-friend in the next 18-24 months. As attrition takes its toll, only 10 jobs will the company contractually be obligated to keep.
Not true because no 22.4 can work if a RPCD is laid off.
“Protected jobs” shall
include RPCDs that will continue to be replaced by employees
covered under Article 41, Section 2
Basically you get the total RPCD and they are protected jobs.
"The number of RPCDs working a Monday through Friday
41, sec 2 is progression for new "RPCD" It is NOT about 22.4's!
Devil's advocate here again.
So if the driver of route 29A says screw this and takes a job at Boeing or the Railroad (Both of which pay more than UPS FYI!). 29A was never in on Mondays! What stops the company from cutting out that route out and renaming it Blueballs2 and puting a 22.4 on it? the RPCD was not replaced by a Art 41 sec 2 employee therefore your quote does not apply!
Do you understand now?
I know what you are saying and that your just trying to make sure RPCD don't get screwed. Hell I don't trust the company one little bit but I do trust the Teamsters. If you ask your Business agent I am sure he will agree that ALL RPCD jobs are protected and will not be diminished (even the T-S that will go M-friend)41, sec 2 is progression for new "RPCD" It is NOT about 22.4's!
Devil's advocate here again.
So if the driver of route 29A says screw this and takes a job at Boeing or the Railroad (Both of which pay more than UPS FYI!). 29A was never in on Mondays! What stops the company from cutting out that route out and renaming it Blueballs2 and puting a 22.4 on it? the RPCD was not replaced by a Art 41 sec 2 employee therefore your quote does not apply!
Do you understand now?
Routes are not jobs. Swing drivers do not have routes, but they do have jobs.
I know what you are saying and that your just trying to make sure RPCD don't get screwed. Hell I don't trust the company one little bit but I do trust the Teamsters. If you ask your Business agent I am sure he will agree that ALL RPCD jobs are protected and will not be diminished.
Oh I am wrong?I wish I had the faith you do, and I'm really trying to help here, not be argumentative, but you're just wrong here. They are not ALL protected jobs. It's only current m-friend jobs that are protected. That's it.
Oh I am wrong?
Let them in the back door and you get slaughteredYeah, forgot about that movie!
Nice comparison.
Once again we have a 8 hour 5 consecutive guarantee in the Southwest. What do you not understand about that?
It does say it.Where in the contract does it say there must be Saturday ground to implement 22.4 language? I must have missed that part.
That is different.Saturday air is Saturday delivery.
Intent and $5 will get you a bag of chips and a Coke.
Sorry it was more like thisNot sure what you mean by this but false accusations hurt everyone, but truly only discredit the accuser.