Baba gounj
So you are all for criminals to be given a free pass just because they have a job.
Where did I say that?
You are sick.
First......they all must leave the country......
Oh yes, lets use your magic wand to send them all back home. It’d be pretty if the problem was to be solved that easily, wouldn’t it? It’d cost Trillions of dollars to send them back home, all of them, but with your little magic wand it’ll be free. However, if your magic wand works, $1.5 trillion would dissappear from our GDP, hitting the economy real bad, and I’m sure there are other complexities. And we will have Obama doing all these unwise bailouts that go against capitalism, again; rising our national debt and insulting Jefferson’s memory. As I’ve said from the beginning of my posts in this thread, this is not an easy issue to deal with, we need good and accurate strategies. You cannot say lets send them all back home, or lets give them all plain amnesty, as both routes wouldn’t solve anything; it’d just make it worst. And you should listen to Bud Hart “Biggun” if you want to talk about criminals.
second ...apply for permission to return........
third... get in the established line of people already waiting to become citizens....{ the ones who play by the rules }
and then maybe.
.................................................. .....
I know of some who came here legally , and after several years & several thousands paid for fees our government still said no.
.................................................. .....................................
tonyexpress
I'm with the 75% of the people that feel the government isn't doing enough to secure the border and the 83% that support the use of the National Guard to patrol the border.
In addition to the high support for increased enforcement, Americans also disagree with the way Obama is dealing with the immigration issue. Fifty-one percent of Americans disapprove of the President's policies. More Americans disapprove of the way he's handling immigration than the way he's handling the oil spill in the Gulf and the economy.
51%? I thought that would be more. I don’t like Obama, but please don’t ever mention me Bush while I’m eating.
If the Fed (in this case Obama) was doing their job to PROTECT the citizens of the USA then Arizona wouldn't have to do it for them now would they?...
This is not a problem that has risen in just 3 years. That’s why I say we need precisely written laws. Not laws that bring more problems than the ones we already have. But, if you are still submerged into that political fight, illegal population has decreased 13.7% from 2007 to 2009. I don’t know how it has decreased but if you’re into the political fighting like the Texan, you should accept that fact.
The Cowboy
Hotshot, I posted links to the US Code to the mirrored laws on this thread. You even (finally) said you had read them. Now you say you can't find them?
Of course I said I already read those Federal Codes you proclaim are the same or mirror SB1070, even before you posted them here. And that’s why, because I have already read those, I say I can’t find that law you guys proclaim it’s the same as SB1070. I’ve already told you that that Federal Law is not the same nor that it mirrors SB1070, and you finally agreed. I’m still looking, please point to me that Federal Law you guys say it’s the same as SB1070, but remember, Texan, it has to be a current one; laws from 1867 to 1964 don’t count.
Oh, that's a funny bit. The thing about funny bits is they are rarely totally true.
I’m glad you liked it. ♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫"All the single ladies, all the single ladies..."♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪ Oh, no, Cowboy it’s the funny truth; as funny is the law.
Amazing huh? 90+% ILLEGAL immigrants like the idea of amnesty. Neither stat proves much, if anything.
Yeah, that’s why I don’t like polls, either. Are you just reading what you like from the polls?
I've already shown you the difference in race and nationality, several times, several ways. This makes your claim that the law is "racially" is unfounded.
Hahahahahahahahaha! You? To Me? LOL. How? With this phrase from yourself: “Discrimination against illegals from Mexico is not racism.” LOL. Someone having a little bit of understanding about races and ethnicities, and discrimination wouldn’t say something like that. But, I’m glad you did understand that there’s no such ethnicity as Mexican Hispanics. LOL.
I personally am against ANY law or legal action that would legitimatize the masses of illegal immigrants living here for any period of time, UNTIL the boarders are secured. Then and ONLY then should there be discussions on what to do about the ones (12-15 million of them) already here illegally.
UNTIL the borders are secured? How you think the border will be secured? With a huge wall standing on the South? Sending troops to the South?
So, my friends, I’ve never said I’m with the 80% of people who approve amnesty. I’m just showing the polls you guys like to read. But, you guys just read what you like, as I see. It’s all about money. If you want to legalize 12 to 15 million illegal immigrants, charge them for it, while they can still collaborate with the economy. How? I don’t know but I’m sure there’s a way without controversy of racial profiling. Oh, and I believe years do count. You don’t need a huge wall or a battalion of soldiers to secure the border if you use your brain. Leave the soldiers credibility for times of war. It won’t take a year or two to solve this problem, neither bizarre laws will solve this problem. And I’m glad some of us agree on one thing: Polls don’t say much as of what is right or wrong with SB1070. And now, don’t pay much attention when you listen the Sheriff saying:”Well, 71% of Arizona like the new law.” SO WHAT!? That isn’t any fundament to say it’s right!