Biden's supreme Court pick

bacha29

Well-Known Member
Look No further than the White House and his family.


You may have to respect it but not me. Respect a pedo lover? Once again I get it.
In the end you'll have to accept it the same as I....Unless of course you plan on taking the law into your own hands simply because you don't get everything you own way all the time.
 

Darmark7

Retired 2020. Not my Problem Anymore!
In the end you'll have to accept it the same as I....Unless of course you plan on taking the law into your own hands simply because you don't get everything you own way all the time.
The difference is I‘ll stand against Pedos and you seem to accept them and probably would even vote for one.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
Yes it does, that's why she's being questioned about them by my representative in government. Ttku lady.
The questions she is being asked are in regard to her application of the rule of law not what the court of public opinion thinks. And as she has pointed out time and time again is that she rules on cases that arise from the laws Congress passes. So if the "righties" don't like her decisions then all they have to do is to amend the law and start the court challenges all over again.

In the end she'll be confirmed and take her seat with the other eight.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
The difference is I‘ll stand against Pedos and you seem to accept them and probably would even vote for one.
Just what is you obsession with pedophiles? It is an obsession because you say nothing about arsonists, terrorists, extortionists racists, white collar criminals etc etc.
 

Darmark7

Retired 2020. Not my Problem Anymore!
Just what is you obsession with pedophiles? It is an obsession because you say nothing about arsonists, terrorists, extortionists racists, white collar criminals etc etc.
If you have information that this Supreme Court pick is easy on arsonist, terrorist, extortionist, racist, white collar criminals ect ect then please share and that will be more that I will be obsessed with and more reasons she needs to go.
What is your leniency and acceptance of a Supreme Court pick that has been nominated by a Pedo and is easy on Pedos? That is the question you should be asking yourself.
 
Last edited:

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
And since I don't and lack the license to challenge such rulings I ACCEPT the judgement of the court And that's WHY they have JUDGES. And you too whether you like it or not have no choice but to do the same. After all you are part of the law and order party.
You not only accept left wing judges being easy on pedophiles, you actually defend it. Says a lot about you
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
" Religious cult of leftism" . Does that include the priests, ministers, teachers coaches and cops who have been charged and convicted of sex crimes and..... the people in positions of power who covered up for them?
No that's a different religious cult than the religious cult of leftism that you are a member of. I understand you think your religion is better than theirs and I don't care.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
The questions she is being asked are in regard to her application of the rule of law not what the court of public opinion thinks.
Public opinion about her application of the rule of law matters, because my representative is accountable to my opinion and the opinions of his constituents in regards to his vote to approve her.

But you're right in the sense that it's not like we're leftist idiots making up stories about rape and questioning her about how much she liked beer in high school. This is actually about her time as a judge. Time she spent making excuses for pedophiles.

Carry on.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Her peers in the profession were generally satisfied and these are people with juris degrees and passed the bar exam. Now tells about your expertise in the field of law. Your obsession with this one of many countless aspects of US law is troubling.
She served on one of the most liberal appeals courts in the country which has had multiple decisions overturned by the Supreme Court. She's an activist trying to BS her way onto the Supreme Court which I'm sure is fine with you.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
You are clearly missing one inescapable fact....These cases are NOT tried in the court of public opinion by people such as you with no formal education in the field of law. And since those cases are NOT tried in the court of public opinion is does NOT matter what you or I think of those sentences.
Can you at least explain why she always went way below the sentencing guidelines and prosecution recommendations in sentencing child porn cases? Why did she apologize to a drug kingpin for giving him the required 20 years? The guy was importing fentanyl in large quantities. Then later she reduced his sentence 7.5 years. You must be getting a tingling feeling up and down your leg at the thought of her being confirmed.
 

PT Stewie

"Big Fella"
I find it extremely puzzling that at the Kavanaugh hearing's the democrat credo was "all women are be believed" but when the latest nominee was asked "what is a women ?" she couldn't or wouldn't answer.
She also avoided or downplayed questions about CRT even though she is on the board of Georgetown Day school where CRT is clearly on the curriculum.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
Can you at least explain why she always went way below the sentencing guidelines and prosecution recommendations in sentencing child porn cases? Why did she apologize to a drug kingpin for giving him the required 20 years? The guy was importing fentanyl in large quantities. Then later she reduced his sentence 7.5 years. You must be getting a tingling feeling up and down your leg at the thought of her being confirm
Here's something I bet Faux News didn't tell you. A group pf federal judges , 2 of them Republican appointees testified at Judge Jackson's hearing that her sentences in child pornography cases were "entirely consistent" with those sentences issued by other federal judges.

But you need not despair. Of the 115 Supreme Court justices 108 of them are old white men. The only type of people you obviously believe are qualified to serve. So the percentages are still with you.

In the meantime, how is that heart surgery public welfare paid for working out for you?. How does having no choice but to seek public welfare relief benefits in order to save your life compare to the hardline conservative rhetoric of yours? You 're always whinning about how others who are in your opinion gaming the system. So what makes what you're doing any different from what they're doing? What conditions places you on a higher moral level than them?
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Here's something I bet Faux News didn't tell you. A group pf federal judges , 2 of them Republican appointees testified at Judge Jackson's hearing that her sentences in child pornography cases were "entirely consistent" with those sentences issued by other federal judges.

But you need not despair. Of the 115 Supreme Court justices 108 of them are old white men. The only type of people you obviously believe are qualified to serve. So the percentages are still with you.

In the meantime, how is that heart surgery public welfare paid for working out for you?. How does having no choice but to seek public welfare relief benefits in order to save your life compare to the hardline conservative rhetoric of yours? You 're always whinning about how others who are in your opinion gaming the system. So what makes what you're doing any different from what they're doing? What conditions places you on a higher moral level than them?
Once again you're lying. It's a wonder you can gulp enough air in between the lies. I'm not whining about anyone and am very thankful a for profit hospital system is willing to write off my surgery. I'm especially thankful that it means there'll be less revenue for Dems to line their pockets with.

We're talking about one specific judge who's looking to be placed on the Supreme Court. She has a record of being soft on crime. And she won't even define what exactly a woman is. Pretty obvious she's part of an agenda Dems have to ultimately change everything about the U.S. And not in a good way.

See you in November!
 

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
Once again you're lying. It's a wonder you can gulp enough air in between the lies. I'm not whining about anyone and am very thankful a for profit hospital system is willing to write off my surgery. I'm especially thankful that it means there'll be less revenue for Dems to line their pockets with.

We're talking about one specific judge who's looking to be placed on the Supreme Court. She has a record of being soft on crime. And she won't even define what exactly a woman is. Pretty obvious she's part of an agenda Dems have to ultimately change everything about the U.S. And not in a good way.

See you in November!
The left is a population consisting of liars, hypocrite’s and freaks.
 
Top