Bill O'Reilly becoming a Non-Factor

[rod]

Maybe you could become a rape counselor and help victims see how funny it is.

The rape wasn't what I would be laughing about----------TTKU

 

[bbsam]

The rape wasn't what I would be laughing about----------TTKU

Hmmmmm. From what I hear, rape victims don't enjoy reliving it on the stand. But you'd be laughing, having a good ol' time. Those silly victims don't know how good they got it!

 

[bbsam]

Nope, was telling my wife this morning how I enjoyed watching O'Reilly's show for many years and never imagined he could do such things. Weinstein however apparently raped some women. There's scummy, and then there's scum. Both are paying for their actions.

So why bring up Weinstein in an Oreilly thread?

Deflecting perhaps?

 

[vantexan]

So why bring up Weinstein in an Oreilly thread?

For some reason I thought he was being discussed too. Senior moment.

 

[bbsam]

For some reason I thought he was being discussed too. Senior moment.

Only as a deflection.

 

[vantexan]

Only as a deflection.

Y'all love that word but rarely give a direct answer to anything, just answer questions with questions.

 

[bbsam]

Y'all love that word but rarely give a direct answer to anything, just answer questions with questions.

Another senior moment? There was no question.

 

[bbsam]

Y'all love that word but rarely give a direct answer to anything, just answer questions with questions.

And I have been answering questions.

 

[vantexan]

And I have been answering questions.

I was making a statement about how you guys love to talk deflection. You used it as a reply to a specific post. But truth is it's hard to nail you and others down as you're always deflecting. At any rate, my comments about Weinstein do hold up under scrutiny. The Democrat Party will turn a blind eye to just about anything as long as the money is flowing and they get the power.

 

[It will be fine]

I was making a statement about how you guys love to talk deflection. You used it as a reply to a specific post. But truth is it's hard to nail you and others down as you're always deflecting. At any rate, my comments about Weinstein do hold up under scrutiny. The Democrat Party will turn a blind eye to just about anything as long as the money is flowing and they get the power.

Where was the coverage of O'Reilly on fox? He was harassing and raping women for a decade and Hannity had him in on a book tour interview.

 

[vantexan]

Where was the coverage of O'Reilly on fox? He was harassing and raping women for a decade and Hannity had him in on a book tour interview.

I'm sorry, I didn't catch the part where he was assaulting them in front of everyone else. Certainly was a black eye for FOX. If Matt Lauer had been forcing himself on Katie Couric do you think NBC would have had a major expose' on it? They'd sweep it under the rug like eve else does.

 

[It will be fine]

I'm sorry, I didn't catch the part where he was assaulting them in front of everyone else. Certainly was a black eye for FOX. If Matt Lauer had been forcing himself on Katie Couric do you think NBC would have had a major expose' on it? They'd sweep it under the rug like eve else does.

Between Bill and Roger Ailes it's pretty clear what the culture at Fox is. Everyone knew what was going on, don't kid yourself.

 

[vantexan]

Between Bill and Roger Ailes it's pretty clear what the culture at Fox is. Everyone knew what was going on, don't kid yourself.

I bet the ladies were talking amongst themselves. But everyone?

 

[BrownArmy]

Everything doesn’t have to be partisan.

Let’s just agree, all these men are scumbags.

It’s not a left/right thing, it’s a penis thing.

Plenty of blame to go around without turning it into another political talking point.

 

[newfie]

Only as a deflection.

agreed. lets talk about the slime ball you want to talk about and not about the one you don't want to talk about.

the sad point for your side which you will now try to deflect is we will get a lot more mileage out of wienstien then you can ever hope to get out of O'reilly.
your guy is the gift that keeps giving .Lot of skeletons to still come out of the closet. then the lawsuits. criminal trials. We'll be talking about wieny for a long time.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

agreed. lets talk about the slime ball you want to talk about and not about the one you don't want to talk about.

the sad point for your side which you will now try to deflect is we will get a lot more mileage out of wienstien then you can ever hope to get out of O'reilly.
your guy is the gift that keeps giving .Lot of skeletons to still come out of the closet. then the lawsuits. criminal trials. We'll be talking about wieny for a long time.

The sad thing is you're defending a guy who beat his wife and sexually assaulted multiple women.

O Reilly is a total D bag, you know it, it just drives you crazy cause you're a koolaid republican like he is.

 

[bbsam]

agreed. lets talk about the slime ball you want to talk about and not about the one you don't want to talk about.

the sad point for your side which you will now try to deflect is we will get a lot more mileage out of wienstien then you can ever hope to get out of O'reilly.
your guy is the gift that keeps giving .Lot of skeletons to still come out of the closet. then the lawsuits. criminal trials. We'll be talking about wieny for a long time.

What's the title of the thread?

 

[floridays]

Hmmmmm. From what I hear, rape victims don't enjoy reliving it on the stand. But you'd be laughing, having a good ol' time. Those silly victims don't know how good they got it!

Even though it is quite often distasteful, very vicious and downright sickening a defendant does have a right to to confront their accuser or witnesses against them. The best example I can think of off the top of my head is the Duke lacrosse trial. Being the father of two sons, I can only say if I had a daughter, I'd probably kill the b a s t u r d. Sorry that's just me. I do know the proper spelling just didn't want to be censored.

 

[floridays]

Even though it is quite often distasteful, very vicious and downright sickening a defendant does have a right to to confront their accuser or witnesses against them. The best example I can think of off the top of my head is the Duke lacrosse trial. Being the father of two sons, I can only say if I had a daughter, I'd probably kill the b a s t u r d. Sorry that's just me. I do know the proper spelling just didn't want to be censored.

 

[floridays]

For some reason I thought he was being discussed too. Senior moment.

Van, you forgot the first tenet of this board, topic or target of post shall never be changed. Shame on you. Sammy is setting precedent, every post will in the future pertain to the original posters thoughts. No correlations to make a point will be allowed.