Bitcoin/Ethereum/cryptocurrencies

Brownslave688

You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
Team speaking at MIT. Google and Amazon speaking at the DKG conference in 2 weeks. AWS a client.

I can only spoon feed y’all so much info. If you are invested in crypto at all and haven’t bought any origintrail you’re blind deaf or dumb. Probably all three🤣🤣🤣

IMG_6989.jpeg

IMG_6990.jpeg
 

Brownslave688

You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
That’s right THE MIT. OT is light years ahead of other projects jumping into the AI race. I watched 20 teams give speeches. Almost every single one was in the seed fund raising stage of development. OT is getting ready to roll out Internet level scaling because there’s so much demand behind the current bottleneck.
IMG_7023.jpeg
 

Over70irregs

Well-Known Member
Nope.

Ethereum was created to solve a different problem than Bitcoin was. Seriously. Quit trolling.
You just literally said nothing. Only problem it solved was making VC’s and insiders rich. The founder dumps/sells regularly. They sell and buy Bitcoin. Lol. Captured by WEF (seriously) I still have old receipts that have been scrubbed.
1728986158902.png

1728986180020.png
 
Last edited:

BadIdeaGuy

Moderator
Staff member
You just literally said nothing. Only problem it solved was making VC’s and insiders rich. The founder dumps/sells regularly. They sell and buy Bitcoin. Lol. Captured by WEF (seriously) I still have old receipts that have been scrubbed.
View attachment 498118
View attachment 498119
Factually untrue.

I’ve used software running on Ethereum, and millions of others have too.

Vitalik has never “dumped” Ethereum.

You are being disingenuous.
 

BadIdeaGuy

Moderator
Staff member
1. Q. Why would you use blockchain software when you can use a database? A. To have tokens so you can..______?
This is one heck of a post for anyone who says he understands how Bitcoin works.

Bitcoin is blockchain software. And could be replaced by a database that would be tenfold more efficient and fast.
And would defeat the purpose of decentralization and trustlessness.

You act like you're the smartest guy here and are trying to spoonfeed us all to agreeing that Bitcoin is the one true application of decentralized technology.

It's not.

Also, Vitalik hasn't sold ETH for profit since 2018. He donates to charity and then the charities sell.
He's holding over a half a billion USD in ETH. Not dumping.
 

Over70irregs

Well-Known Member
This is one heck of a post for anyone who says he understands how Bitcoin works.

Bitcoin is blockchain software. And could be replaced by a database that would be tenfold more efficient and fast.
And would defeat the purpose of decentralization and trustlessness.

You act like you're the smartest guy here and are trying to spoonfeed us all to agreeing that Bitcoin is the one true application of decentralized technology.

It's not.

Also, Vitalik hasn't sold ETH for profit since 2018. He donates to charity and then the charities sell.
He's holding over a half a billion USD in ETH. Not dumping.
-You want your $ to be a vault..secure not watered down with weeds(altcoins) and roundup(CEO’s)
-Don’t have to be smart to tell the truth.
-Hard to replace the biggest decentralized computer network in the universe.
-Vitalik washes Eth on exchanges to limit tracking. If you invent/create tokens and cash out you are in profit. You forgot about VC’s and buddies he gave free Eth to.
-Scammers send him free meme coins as advertisement. He donates them to “charities” and “web 3,4,5,6 projects”. Trying to be robinhood.
 

100%ORIONComplianceGuy

25+ Year UPSer and Teamster
This is one heck of a post for anyone who says he understands how Bitcoin works.

Bitcoin is blockchain software. And could be replaced by a database that would be tenfold more efficient and fast.
And would defeat the purpose of decentralization and trustlessness.

You act like you're the smartest guy here and are trying to spoonfeed us all to agreeing that Bitcoin is the one true application of decentralized technology.

It's not.

Also, Vitalik hasn't sold ETH for profit since 2018. He donates to charity and then the charities sell.
He's holding over a half a billion USD in ETH. Not dumping.
It can be replaced but only after someone convinces enough of its participants to abandon the network for something else. Thats not likely anytime soon. Not as a monetary/savings asset anyway. A fork is actually more possible in the near future. But even that is not likely to happen.

So, as it stands, BTC is king. There are other “coins” that are fundamentally similar. Or even better. But sometimes it’s better to already have widespread usage and adoption than be released later with improvements.
 

BadIdeaGuy

Moderator
Staff member
It can be replaced but only after someone convinces enough of its participants to abandon the network for something else. Thats not likely anytime soon. Not as a monetary/savings asset anyway. A fork is actually more possible in the near future. But even that is not likely to happen.

So, as it stands, BTC is king. There are other “coins” that are fundamentally similar. Or even better. But sometimes it’s better to already have widespread usage and adoption than be released later with improvements.
You fundamentally misunderstand what Bitcoin is.

You say "a fork is actually more possible in the the near future".

ANYONE can fork Bitcoin. It's not even hard. What you meant to say is that it is more possible that a fork of bitcoin might achieve some level of acceptance by the rest of society.

Bitcoin is nothing more than a collection of computer programs that communicate over a mutually agreed protocol. Any individual, or group of individuals that change the accepted protocol have created a fork.

Just apples and oranges with maxis on here.
Bitcoin is fantastic at being Bitcoin. It sucks at being Ethereum, or most any other utilitarian token.

I'm not dissing Bitcoin, but to limit blockchain technology to purely monetary transfers is insulting to the potential of the technology.
 

Over70irregs

Well-Known Member
You fundamentally misunderstand what Bitcoin is.

You say "a fork is actually more possible in the the near future".

ANYONE can fork Bitcoin. It's not even hard. What you meant to say is that it is more possible that a fork of bitcoin might achieve some level of acceptance by the rest of society.

Bitcoin is nothing more than a collection of computer programs that communicate over a mutually agreed protocol. Any individual, or group of individuals that change the accepted protocol have created a fork.

Just apples and oranges with maxis on here.
Bitcoin is fantastic at being Bitcoin. It sucks at being Ethereum, or most any other utilitarian token.

I'm not dissing Bitcoin, but to limit blockchain technology to purely monetary transfers is insulting to the potential of the technology.
Copying blockchain without proof of work leads to centralization or limited network. Centralization leads to Worldlibertycoin(Trump). Bitcoin cannot be dissed It waits for < coin collapse. Question is do we vote for known scam or be free?

(They've completely backpedaled on their promise that "63% of tokens will be sold to the public"
That number is now only 35%
That means $WLFI will be a low float, high FDV token)
 
Top