Mutineer
Well-Known Member
We agree on most things, but I will have to disagree with your analysis here. The company will always be the respondent. A driver may have criminal exposure.
I think better money would be spent on backup cameras. I was there as you were. Which camera on all trucks would prove to be more beneficial?
I know the answer as you do.
I've been on both sides, I'll ask you as I did Dano, Why the perceived push to penalize the humps that provide the revenue? I'm asking questions now, guide me through it.
It's just a big shakedown. Like an ISO certification. If the technology or protocol exists that 'might' make something safer or better, then companies are pressured into adopting these things or risk being found negligent, anti-progressive, or behind the times.
And nobody cares what or how the stooges or, as you put it, "humps" behind the wheel think or feel.
Just another blue-collar laborer. Another box-donkey. Dime a dozen. If they don't like it, I'm sure their green-card wielding replacements won't mind at all.