climate catastrophe

rickyb

Well-Known Member
The hockey stick graph?

Nice website
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Thats wat were doing.

Man made global warming which @Box Ox article reoeatedly mentions and nukes
Even the top climate scientists are coming to grip with the reality that they were fooled and wrong.

“For a long period I uncritically absorbed the notion that climate change represented the pre-eminent challenge facing humanity in the twenty-first century. ... I was easily convinced that the growing human influence on the world’s climate would be a reality that all nations would increasingly need to confront, a reality to which their interests would necessarily be subservient and that would be decisive for shaping their development pathways. For more than half of these 40 or so years, it seemed to me self-evident that relations between nations would forcibly be re-shaped by the exigencies of a changing climate.

But now, in the mid-2020s, I can see that I got this the wrong way round. ... Too often the language, rhetoric, and campaigning around climate change remains wedded to a world that no longer exists. ... Rather than geopolitics having to bend to the realities of a changing climate, the opposite has happened. ... In short, this optimism was fueled by the rise of globalism; thinking strategically about climate change was caught-up in this zeitgeist. ... Climate is not the only thing that is changing through our lifetimes, and perhaps not the most important thing. ...”

 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Did you even read the article?

It supports wat ive been saying

Micahel mann is in it
Michael Mann is a scrub

“climate scientist Michael Mann harassed National Review through litigation over a blog post — until, eventually, the First Amendment brought an end to his attack. This week, a court in our nation’s capital ordered Mann to pay us $530,820.21 worth of attorney’s fees and costs, and to do so within 30 days. It is time for him to get out his checkbook, and sign on the dotted line.”


 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
There is no such thing as man-made global warming. The Earth will cool and heat up with or without us. Even nukes will not permanently destroy the earth. It will begin healing instantly.
Were not going to heal after nuclear war lol. Its game over for civilization at that point.

Even on boxox s graph you can see the spike at the end or the quotes
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Were not going to heal after nuclear war lol. Its game over for civilization at that point.

Even on boxox s graph you can see the spike at the end or the quotes
If there’s a nuclear war The Earth will heal itself whether we’re here or not is debatable.

Stop worrying about things you don’t control. You don’t control nuclear weapons and you don’t control nature.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
If there’s a nuclear war The Earth will heal itself whether we’re here or not is debatable.

Stop worrying about things you don’t control. You don’t control nuclear weapons and you don’t control nature.
I agree with first sentence.

Nuclear war is the anti christ

We control nukes and carbon emissions
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
I agree with first sentence.

Nuclear war is the anti christ

We control nukes and carbon emissions
The elite control, the nuclear weapons and the elites make you believe carbon emissions are hurting things, but they really would like to do is get rid of you. You are the ultimate carbon emission.
 

oldngray

nowhere special
The elite control, the nuclear weapons and the elites make you believe carbon emissions are hurting things, but they really would like to do is get rid of you. You are the ultimate carbon emission.
Globalism. Its all about redistribution of wealth and ultimately reducing the populations by 90%. Leaving just them left to enjoy their own paradise.

Or for the extremists it would be reduce the world population by 100% to create a perfect and unspoiled world.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Ww1 was just a little thing blown out of proportion

Same thing couldve happened in the middle east now. Probably in ukraine too.

Billy graham was against nukes. He was right. So was daniel berrigan
I thought you didn’t like Billy Graham? Lol and who is for nukes? I mean at this point they might be necessary to hold everyone at but who actually likes them?
 
Top