Hoaxter, all these H boot lickers do is lie. R. G is not TDU but they continue to lie. Their president had to pay a $500 fine for lying to the election officer. He got caught in Camden camera. This was after they called G's wife names in the restaurant. These guys are nothing but lying thugs man.
Listen doofus, the election officers job was NOT to investigate a crime. It was to investigate whether or nor R G violated any election rules by having his WIFE interfere with a sitting officer on the current Eboard.
While the election officer conducted NO investigation other than to gather reports taken by the:
1) Hotel security personnel
2) Metro Vegas PD
3) Hotel security cameras
Then review each and determined whether or not any ELECTION rules were broken. At the end of the day, the officer found that NO RULES were broken By R. G, however, the officer sanctioned J. Phillips for statements in his reports to Hotel Security and Metro Police that didnt quite match the video surveillance.
J. Phillips account may not have been totally accurate upon review, but at the time, given the circumstances, its easy to establish that Phillips could easily make a mistake in recounting events as they happened so quickly and unexpectedly. Did P G jump on his back? Maybe not, but she did attack from the back, grab, turn, hold and place her hand on Phillips chest. This was confirmed by the election officer and subsequqently confirmed by a Los Angeles Superior court judge.
Did P G scratch his face? Maybe not, but she admits reaching for his face and attempting to point her finger in his face while shouting obscentities at him. Even when she was separated from him by other teamsters, P G was attempting to reach over the person in between her and phillips and was still trying to get in phillips face. This is confirmed in the election officers report and admitted by P G herself.
The election officers job was not to establish criminality for legal charges, that was not his assignment, his assignment was to investigate charges filed by J. Phillips for election violations.
The duty of establishing criminality was done by a Superior Court Judge here in Los Angeles who heard the case, watched all the surveilance videos and made a ruling without EVER hearing P Galvans side of the story.
P G and R G made a decision to appear in court without legal counsel whereas J. Phillips was represented by counsel. The judge, after hearing testimony from J. Phillips, and then viewing all the tapes made his decision, finding that the tapes SPOKE for themselves and ANY testimony from P G would not help her case. A three year restraining order was placed in effect, and P G must stay away from J Phillips or any UNION function that Phillps may be attending. It furthers that in the event that the both of them arrive at a union function, its P G who must leave the function and stay at least 300 yards away from J. Phillips.
No mattter what the election officer decided in the matter of election violations, the criminal aspect of the case was proven and a judgement entered against P G. She was also ordered to surrender any guns in her possession.
As for P Galvans kooky claims of name calling and such obsurtities, she offers no proof that Phillips or any other union member is behind those things. Reading P Galvans statements to hotel security , the police and the election officer shows an emotional woman who lost control of not only herself, but her rational thought as well. P G admits to wanting a confrontation with Phillips and intended to interupt Phillips right to peace and free travel by grabbing his arm, turning him around, placing her hand on his chest and shouting obsentities to him.
If you view this in any other manner than how it was explained by all accounts, then you dont know how to read.
J. Phillips accounts of what happened can be easily explained if you apply logic and rational thought to the scenario.
Merely extrapolating the end result of the election officers finding and leaving out the totality of the investigation and subsequent court hearings is too deny reality. Nice try though.
Next time you try to do your Perry Mason impersonation, try applying all the facts of the case before you reach a conclusion.
Peace.