Oh, please. We're not professional negotiators or lawyers and the actual language isn't necessary to pass the word up to those who are in order to effect the change we'd like to see in the Contract.
Contract Change proposals. "On Topic Only Please"
- Thread starter Integrity
- Start date
Oh, please. We're not professional negotiators or lawyers and the actual language isn't necessary to pass the word up to those who are in order to effect the change we'd like to see in the Contract.
Integrity
Binge Poster
Think what you want.
Lol working Mondays!
Active Member
Lower progression!
Thanks, I will.
BigBrown87
If it’s brown, it’s going down
Sorry get paid to deliver packages not write contract language, might want to talk to teamster NNC on that one. If you want the goods you gotta pay my friend nothing in life is free.
OP is just trying to be self-indulgent in acting like it's important to create actual Contract language here.
Integrity
Binge Poster
NP it's your call.
BigBrown87
If it’s brown, it’s going down
No they are opinions by teamsters that disagree with the language that has been agreed upon, still should be considered and not deemed blasphemy or condemnation.
Integrity
Binge Poster
Probably fair to say that trying to have truck drivers formulate strong contractual language is counterproductive at best.
BigBrown87
If it’s brown, it’s going down
Actually it's not my call, I pay my dues and vote just like everyone else your post is to suggest new contract language to the current agreement. I did give you adjustments that I would see help this contract be seen in my opinion pass. I have never claimed to be someone that could write language for any contract most people that do so are lawyers or people that have degrees to do so. If you want to be a troll and give smart ass responses to other members you will not get far.
Integrity
Binge Poster
I don't know where you came up with the word blasphemy but see how far wholesale condemnation of a TA that has a handshake agreement at the highest level of negotiations gets you.
I don't think it is an effective position to take, but have at it.
Integrity
Binge Poster
Who do you think writes a lot of that?
It is certainly not written all by lawyers.
You have read it.
BigBrown87
If it’s brown, it’s going down
Opinions are like
s everyone has got them including you so your no different then the TDU, sorry to ruin your night.
Integrity
Binge Poster
Really, like all of the Union officials have degrees.
Integrity
Binge Poster
Have it your way .Opinions are like
Which one of these concessions are just fine with you, great savior?
They are the Union's designated negotiators, who, as the leaders of an organization that represents 1.4 million members, do have support staff working with them when they themselves lack expertise in any particular area.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Are you dense?
You want language?
How bout we leave the language the same way it was in the last contract?
Wouldn't that be better than these concessions?
Why are we going backwards?
Why are we giving them concessions in this economic environment?
Do you have anything to add to this discussion, or are you just here to sell this crap contract?
BigBrown87
If it’s brown, it’s going down
The union employs lawyers to go through the language after it has been written up if this helps you but I doubt it will.
BigBrown87
If it’s brown, it’s going down
Another troll another wasted thread, I almost cant wait until this contract passes so these idots can crawl back to whatever hole they came from and disappear for good.
eats packages
Deranged lunatic
What was this, a week ago? Easy cake to put this all into the tentative agreement.
Similar threads
