This is only partially true. The Company presents a compensation package and works with the Union to determine how it is to be split between FT and PT.
It is obvious that PT wages need to be addressed.
I would still like to see the option of a slightly higher wage in lieu of benefits, especially for those who can still be covered by their parents' insurance.
How is this "partially true"? The union gets x amount of $/hr and the union splits it up.
The company has griped for years at the turn over in pters due to the low compensation and who determines when the pt gets healthcare? After one year?
Regardless of the reason for the deferred HC the company has to eat the turn over and for years they've taken it on the financial chin.
These are minimum levels of compensation so why doesn't the company just raise the pt wage across the board right now or from day one of a new CBA since they "work with the union" on the pay scale. They agree to an amount/hr but they've not been happy with the PT's massive turn over due to the starting pay.