This is a great point. It doesnt suit your argument really, even though you "think" it does.
At the time, Charles Whitman used what would be considered today as OLD guns and ineffective against a police department today. However, at the time, his weapons were BETTER and more accurate than ANY of the guns the police had at the time rendering the police force USELESS to stop him.
Combined with a good vantage point and height, the police weapons could not reach the shooter and effectively giving the shooter the advantage by having the better guns.
It took 4 men, to breach the tower and take him out at close range at a great sacrifice to themselves.
.