Ask new management how their UPS pension is. I mean 401k.I did not support the strike then and certainly would not support one today.
The union claimed that the strike was about the part timers but it was clear that the strike was about the pensions, which, in hindsight, we should have let the company take over.
The one positive I took from the strike is just how fortunate I am to have a career which allows me to take care of my family while preparing for a secure retirement.
There are no (long term) winners in a strike.
Which has nothing to do with anything here.Ask new management how their UPS pension is. I mean 401k.
Of course you didn't support the strike.I did not support the strike then and certainly would not support one today.
The union claimed that the strike was about the part timers but it was clear that the strike was about the pensions, which, in hindsight, we should have let the company take over.
The one positive I took from the strike is just how fortunate I am to have a career which allows me to take care of my family while preparing for a secure retirement.
There are no (long term) winners in a strike.
I actually think it does.Which has nothing to do with anything here.
Well, almost anybody...See, anybody can write silly stuff while sounding educated.
Ask new management how their UPS pension is. I mean 401k.
Good thing you have access to one.I dunno. As a union guy hearing about pension issues a 401K is sounding pretty good right now.
Good one ... I was expecting that!Well, almost anybody...
Ups running our pension would have nothing to do with that. The union would still dictate how much goes in for each employee.I actually think it does.
Do you think than UPS would do to us, what they did to management, if they could.
They are on the path to doing it now.
For me, I am less than 17 months away from having to pay deductibles for the 1st time in my life.
For a company that destroys it's employees bodies, that is just wrong.
I wasn't talking about UPS running our pensions.Ups running our pension would have nothing to do with that. The union would still dictate how much goes in for each employee.
The only difference is ups would control the money not the union.
Either your reading comprehension needs work or you think our money would of been pooled with magements money for 1 giant pension. Either way wow.I wasn't talking about UPS running our pensions.
I was talking about UPS doing to the union what they did to management.
New employees won't have a pension, they'll have a 401k plan only.
And I'd you don't think that will effect everyone else in the pension funds you are crazy.
Pensions are ponzi schemes that rely on new money to help pay for retirees.
No new money equals massive pension cuts
Where did I say UPS would (or even could) pool our pensions with managements?Either your reading comprehension needs work or you think our money would of been pooled with magements money for 1 giant pension. Either way wow.
Only in a feel good way.Most customers blamed the strike on UPS not the Teamster members. We had solid support for standing up to big brown and their last best offer. Take it of leave it. The strike was a victory for all working people in this country.
Upstate said its looking like letting ups control the pension may have been the better decision.Where did I say UPS would (or even could) pool our pensions with managements?
I didn't.
So maybe you need to re-read my post
What I was saying was they could try that with us. No pensions for new hires.
And look at CS pension for an example of what happens with no new members.
How's Central States doing since UPS pulled out?
I know they weren't doing well, but now they are almost bankrupt.