trickpony1
Well-Known Member
I think either would be appropriate in this context.
Take Cosmo out of the sentence....
Which one sounds better?
you could learn a thing or two from me or;
you could learn a thing or two from I?
Glad I could help.
I think either would be appropriate in this context.
He only does oral.
At least he’s not overweight!!!!!Can you blame him? I mean with all due respect who wants to look at this face in mid-coitus.
View attachment 168370
Can you blame him? I mean with all due respect who wants to look at this face in mid-coitus.
View attachment 168370
At least he’s not overweight!!!!!
I agree, I was just trying to find something nice to say about Dave. That’s all I could come up with!!!!!!Hey fat guys need loving too.
I admit I was mistaken on one point, but I'm fairly certain I got it corrected in the second post. The fact that the contract does not state that clocking out without checking with management is terminable makes it much easier to establish past practices. Past practices are not on an individual or case by case basis. So the fact that the OP was only back for 3 weeks has no bearing on past practices, if what he says about other people doing the same thing without discipline is true.Apparently you don't either.
Incorrect.
Incorrect.
I agree.
I agree.
Winner.
Incorrect.
Generally, but not inclusively.
Not in the contract.
But, then again, neither is workplace violence. But it is a terminable offense.
Job abandonment simply means that a person has left the job with no intention of returning without telling anyone.
Exactly what the OP did.
She clocked out without telling anyone she was leaving, and without knowing whether she had completed her job for the day.
So anyone can leave work after they feel they've completed their non-defined work as long as they "intend" to return the following day? You should be doing stand up in Vegas.The OP obviously intended to return to the job on the next scheduled day (since he did), so not job abandonment, regardless of how much you want to twist the definition.
Oh boy...we got Clarence Darrow reincarnate."in material fact"
Either you work in the BOG or you need a hearing test.I've never heard of anyone in my center get a write up for tardiness.
Inaccurate.Past practice is contract.
Mug is not taking any side. However, he is more experienced in contract enforcement and labor law than you, which is proven by your inaccurate assumption of the ease of success using a "past practice" argument.Why take management's side? That's too easy. They don't need support, they just do whatever they want. Unless you are management, in which case I'll use shorter words from now on.
Mug is not taking any side. However, he is more experienced in contract enforcement and labor law than you, which is proven by your inaccurate assumption of the ease of success using a "past practice" argument.
The whole point here is you don't "know" anything about the real facts of this case other than the rosy side the OP presented.
A rookie steward finds out very fast how many "material facts" are conveniently withheld by at fault grievants.
So anyone can leave work after they feel they've completed their non-defined work as long as they "intend" to return the following day? You should be doing stand up in Vegas.
The OP obviously intended to return to the job on the next scheduled day
male according to his profile, currently
What he (male according to his profile, currently) did was more akin to tardiness in material fact.
Company policy is what the company does, not what's on a piece of paper.
It's actually less serious an offense
Is tardiness a terminable offense?
The OP was singled out,
possibly in violation of ADA.
The company needs to be shown that these fake firings will cost them if they keep it up.
Why take management's side?
they just do whatever they want.
Unless you are management,
in which case I'll use shorter words from now on.
One of my positions at UPS was clerk in delivery center. Started at 5 p.m. Only supervision was until driver sup went home usually by 6 or 7 pm then I was on my own. Whenever I completed my job, I left not notifying anyone. I would always work my 8 hours but sometimes up to 12 hours. Wasn't even required to punch in and out for lunch. Dummies! Never ever was questioned by anyone about leaving or why I had to work whatever number of hours it took to complete the job.
Sorry. I thought I saw someone reply to the OP and used "she." I will refer to him as a he from now on.
.
This particular day i did have a set job. Just last week (on same job) when i was done i was left to my work area until sort when down i did look for a sup he said just stay in your area. I dont mind standing around but not when managment considers it stealing time. Which is why i ended up just clocking out and calling it a day.I told you that I am always up for a good debate, no matter how long it takes.
You had a set job, and new when it was done.
There are many positions like this.
The OP was on a made up job, wandering around helping where needed. He had no idea when his job was complete until he was told he was no longer needed.
Big difference.
have you ever fallen asleep while standing up?This particular day i did have a set job. Just last week (on same job) when i was done i was left to my work area until sort when down i did look for a sup he said just stay in your area. I dont mind standing around but not when managment considers it stealing time. Which is why i ended up just clocking out and calling it a day.
Me, my mistake. Took a guess based on the username.
when down i did look for a sup he said just stay in your area.
Which is why i ended up just clocking out and calling it a day.