Yeah our BA always says its vague for a reason. Gives both sides wiggle room. If it was black and white there would be no defending the employee of a cardinal sin.UPS has changed the meaning of a cardinal sin so they can use that excuse in any case they want to interpret as a cardinal sin. The contract language is very vague on the definition which of course allows UPS flexibility and opportunity to abuse. There are definitely times when someone deserves to immediately be fired but I have seen others where it wasn't justified in my opinion.
Cardinals used to be quite specific in definition, right? Wasn't there a list?UPS has changed the meaning of a cardinal sin so they can use that excuse in any case they want to interpret as a cardinal sin. The contract language is very vague on the definition which of course allows UPS flexibility and opportunity to abuse. There are definitely times when someone deserves to immediately be fired but I have seen others where it wasn't justified in my opinion.
Cardinals used to be quite specific in definition, right? Wasn't there a list?
I just remember they used to have a cardinal sin list posted years ago in the cafeteria...A short list I think but I don't remember the exact wording. Not quite specific but less vague than it is now.
Now, anyting you do wrong.....they try to pull "failure to follow Instructions"A short list I think but I don't remember the exact wording. Not quite specific but less vague than it is now.
If insubordination were a cardinal sin...they would've marched my big mouth out of the building a long time ago...lolNow, anyting you do wrong.....they try to pull "failure to follow Instructions"
I've been tryin for 8 years....they still won't! lolA loader really has to work hard to get fired.
Your building has a cafeteria?I just remember they used to have a cardinal sin list posted years ago in the cafeteria...
Yes, sir.Your building has a cafeteria?