kingOFchester
Well-Known Member
nough said
Last edited:
Interesting article. I saw an Amazon delivery van almost drive head on into a minivan full of kids a couple days ago. Wonder if they will hire the same type of pilots and feeder drivers as their package van guys.nough said
Interesting article. I saw an Amazon delivery van almost drive head on into a minivan full of kids a couple days ago. Wonder if they will hire the same type of pilots and feeder drivers as their package van guys.
I do fear this company. No joke.
Me too lol. I am serious, their vans are full in my neck of the country. Scary stuff.I have seen drivers in my center do crazy driving like this. We are a bonus center.
Here's how ups and fedex defeat this:nough said
The USPS doesn't need planes, FedEx carries it all. So FedEx would still get that business, just in a different way.Amazon:"_______ ummm there goes our thin profit margins and customers because we can't get the USPS (who owns no planes) or local region carriers to handle our volume. We can't deliver it yet because we outsource all our delivery operations.
The USPS doesn't need planes, FedEx carries it all. So FedEx would still get that business, just in a different way.
Not to mention the DOJ would probably investigate us for Anti Trust violations.
I'm willing to bet there is a clause in the contract saying they have to take a certain amount of volume. Plus, if they're flying planes half empty, and can make money on filling it with USPS volume, they're going to.Don't think for a minute that fedex won't limit that volume though.
It's not antitrust if we just say bugger off. It's if we AND FedEx do. It looks fishy at first. I'm not saying we'd get fined. But I wouldn't doubt there'd be an investigation.I don't think telling Amazon that we aren't going to take their volume anymore or if we do, we will charge more, warrants Antitrust violations. We aren't obligated to take their business at break even or a loss. I think UPS needs to push back on them because Amazon seems to be able to go out into the media and say whatever they want regarding our business.
Also isn't it great to see another Amazon thread????
People far above me are paid quite well to worry about this.
It's time to "phase " them out either by charging more or just walking away over time. I'm sure there is a strategy in place. A 100 year plus company isn't going to go down without a fight.
Also isn't it great to see another Amazon thread????
Is Amazon going to be a competitor?
Amazon is looking to cut cost and increase profitability. Amazon won't be hauling Overstock, Wayfair, ebay, Best Buy, or any of their competition. That is unless they buy them like they did Zappos.
There is no way Amazons competition would support an Amazon Delivery service to help their competition be more profitable.
Now the down side. There are a lot of small businesses that fulfill orders for Amazon outside of the Amazon DC's. I'm sure those businesses would use an Amazon Delivery service or an approved carrier to take advantage of competitive rates.
Bottom line is I'd be concerned about lost revenue. Lost volume of this size would lead to lay offs at UPS. The company would find a way to adjust and maintain by sacrificing payroll.
I don't think anyone believes ups is too big to fail but also we've been around over 100 years and logistics is not an easy infrastructure to build. If Amazon thinks they'll do it overnight like they try everything else, well they'll fail. They also are starting to spread themselves way too thin. They have major issues too. They are about to go through the "wal-mart" syndrome and that's not good. Don't think for a second that if we walked away from Amazon that would not hurt them either.I love how most of us have no faith in the powers above, until we talk about Amazon.
Is ups to big to fail? Kodak, the inventor of the digital camera was once considered to big to fail.