that pompous ass.Careful, Alexa hears all, your comment will Echo in eternity.
Your future robot overlords won't be happy with that dissent.
Heil Bezos!
that pompous ass.Careful, Alexa hears all, your comment will Echo in eternity.
Your future robot overlords won't be happy with that dissent.
Heil Bezos!
My preppy look fooled all the girls' parents.i bet you were one of those guys that wore daisy dukes and mid-drifts
My preppy look fooled all the girls' parents.
Nothing makes the ladies swoon like last year's Lacoste line from the local thrift store. Ah the good old days.
btw this is from timothy snyder, yale professor who famously wrote a book "on tyranny"
"If there is no truth, there are no facts; if there are no facts, there is no rule of law; and if there is no rule of law, you can’t maintain a liberal democracy."
you should check him out for more. when america collapses, which it will, it should be fairly ugly considering your history of violence.
you can toss that Members Only jacket now!Nothing makes the ladies swoon like last year's Lacoste line from the local thrift store. Ah the good old days.
Another Republican Instant Expert on Defending the Indefensible.news flash.......................
Because of Donald Trump's actions the world has stopped it's rotation .
Film at 11.
even if his piece on the covair was wrong, which im guessing it wasnt, doesnt mean the other stuff he says or does is wrong tooNader seldom uses facts. And when he does he usually interprets them incorrectly.
He became famous for his hit piece on Corvairs which upon closer examination was full of errors. He has not improved with age.
For a gazillion years, weather cycles happened........now the world is loaded with Chicken Littles .
Nader seldom uses facts. And when he does he usually interprets them incorrectly.
More Co2, Less CH4
hot air from the mouths of politicians + methane from their other end = harness the power of politicians to solve the energy crisis.
Has anyone seen a coherent argument for leaving the Paris accord? I haven't heard one. I listened to a rebuplican senator, Lee I think, trying to support it. He didn't make a whole lot of sense. He basically said we don't need an agreement because we are better at reducing emissions than anyone else already. If we're so good at it why make us look like the uneducated dunce in the corner of the classroom?
yep
6 million jobs
china and india not required to do anything
us to pay the countries doing all the polluting billions of dollars.
New energy job growth will be in clean energy and renewables. Solar already employs more people than coal and will continue to do so.yep
6 million jobs
china and india not required to do anything
us to pay the countries doing all the polluting billions of dollars.
New energy job growth will be in clean energy and renewables. Solar already employs more people than coal and will continue to do so.
No one is "required" to do anything, the entire agreement is non-binding. It was written so the US could set our own goals.
There is nothing that pays other countries billions of dollars.
Again, is there a coherent argument for leaving?