Read up on your literary terms. You probably mean "Big, bad, evil corporation = redundant." "Kind, considerate, thoughtful corporation = oxymoron." I think.![]()
You're right, I should've said synonymous.
Read up on your literary terms. You probably mean "Big, bad, evil corporation = redundant." "Kind, considerate, thoughtful corporation = oxymoron." I think.![]()
Did you see my post about the policy not being final? Legal sent the managers an email, basically saying, before any accident gets 'written up', they need to check with legal first. To me that means there might/should be a revision. But, the revised policy won't affect 90% of the couriers. Would you want someone who has that many accidents/tickets in 1,3,5/whatever years working for you? Ask bbsam if one of his couriers has 2-3 accidents in 1 year, what would he do?LTFedExer. do you think with this latest policy change things might just be a little rigged? A smidge? Maybe? Hello?
Since when is setting up couriers to fail new? It's been that way since I started. All you do is play their game. If you can't make service at the numbers they set, you request a check ride and get the numbers changed. Our manager tells us EVERY DAY to go out 2 over. The main reason being most couriers can't count right anyway. I don't go out over what our sheets say. IF I CAN, I will take more. Being a bulk route, for me it comes down to piece count, not stop count.Give me an address, and I'll send you a copy of what I'm sending out. It may go nowhere, but it's worth a try. FedEx can only say they told you to be "safe" to a point, and they've gone far beyond that. They knowingly send people on the road setup to fail regarding safety. You know, I know it, and so does the corporation. It's all about the money, and they could give a rat's ass if anyone gets harmed.
Did you see my post about the policy not being final? Legal sent the managers an email, basically saying, before any accident gets 'written up', they need to check with legal first. To me that means there might/should be a revision. But, the revised policy won't affect 90% of the couriers. Would you want someone who has that many accidents/tickets in 1,3,5/whatever years working for you? Ask bbsam if one of his couriers has 2-3 accidents in 1 year, what would he do?
I doubt that driver was speeding to make a dentist appointment.I was cut-off on the highway by a speeding FedEx Express today, I was around 65 maybe 70 tops, he was near 80mph. One of those sprinter type vans, not sure what you call it. Is this what you mean by coerced into reckless driving and speeding as a result of FedEx coercing individuals into doing the job the wrong way?
I'd love a copy of this. PM sent.Give me an address, and I'll send you a copy of what I'm sending out.
Don't tell anyone I told you this but I've buried the needle in my Grumman 700 twice on the highway going down hill. Maybe my vintage 1997 Grumman doesn't have a governor, I don't know. This was back when I was a rookie and I was all rah, rah, purple promise, gotta get these P1s off in time.I don't doubt you were cut off by Fedex sprinter, but Fedex sprinters are governed at 68 mph max. Very frustrating to drive because while speed limit here is 70, I can't pass anyone on the highway due to the governor, though Fedex corporate speed limit is 65!!!!
Actually, it might have something to do with the FedEx and their CSA score, which supposedly isn't very good. Good try with the "crappy, reckless, unsafe individual" bit, but it won't fly here. Sure, there are some reckless people, but IMO, if you see someone speeding or otherwise being unsafe, it's a result of being pushed to do too much in too little time. Express has multiple hard deadlines for service, unlike Ground, which only has to deliver on the right day.
This will eventually result in a huge lawsuit, and FedEx will pay big money when one of our couriers gets in a really bad accident that kills enough people to make headlines. Like the Domino's scandal a few years ago, FedEx will finally have to stop forcing it's drivers to break the law just to keep their jobs. Sooner or later, the national media will pickup on this fact, and it's unfortunate that someone is going to have to pay the ultimate price to bring FedEx into compliance.
I'm working on a letter to 60 Minutes, a copy of which will be sent to other media outlets as well, which outlines this issue. A copy of the letter will also be sent to each state DOT, and to the Federal Highway Safety Administration. FedEx is a big advertiser, but hopefully, I'll be able to get enough interest to generate a media investigation into Express employer practices. A governmental investigation would also be quite revealing.
Get that checkbook ready Fred, because you're going to be paying some big fines.
I think MFE would have better luck getting moreluck to accept an invitation to sit down and discuss politics with him.![]()
Still waiting on a copy of that letter MFE.
"This is what happens when you don't have a union."
Do you read the rest of this site? To me it seems it's happening and has nothing to do with a union or not. The upper-class management of all corporations are making a major play on the working class right now.
That's certainly true, but not having a union makes employees much more vulnerable.
Or maybe a union gives them a false sense of security.
More accurately a sense of entitlement.
At least if one of your guys gets dragged into a mgrs. office to give your side of some complaint, you've got someone else on your side. We have nobody.More accurately a sense of entitlement.
At least if one of your guys gets dragged into a mgrs. office to give your side of some complaint, you've got someone else on your side. We have nobody.