1989
Well-Known Member
What a waste of paper.I have no clue but obviously a lot of people aren't voting.
What a waste of paper.I have no clue but obviously a lot of people aren't voting.
All members must be treated equally.No. If you are a dues paying member, you paid for the right to vote.
Just like that stack of papers I got in the mailbox to vote?What a waste of paper.
Shouldn't be allowed to vote until you have 20 years vested. Young guys no nothing and are easily manipulated.Shouldnt be allowed to vote unless you have been with the company for 5 years. I think voter turnout is then over 50%.
You are paying for union representation not the right to vote. A right to vote should be earned.No. If you are a dues paying member, you paid for the right to vote.
Shouldn't be allowed to vote until you have 20 years vested. Young guys no nothing and are easily manipulated.[/QUOT
I disagree. An 18 year old employee who has been there for 60 days doesnt give 2 poops about voting. He shouldnt have a voice in the future of the company until he has put his time in.No. If you are a dues paying member, you paid for the right to vote.
A little extreme but fine by me.Shouldn't be allowed to vote until you have 20 years vested. Young guys no nothing and are easily manipulated.
Should he have the option not to pay dues also?I disagree. An 18 year old employee who has been there for 60 days doesnt give 2 poops about voting. He shouldnt have a voice in the future of the company until he has put his time in.
The system is broke. Has voter turnout ever been over 50%?Lots of uneducated members. We all have work to do if we want the union to work for us. It’s not doing much for us currently.
No. He is paying for union representation. If he wants to vote, he needs to put in his time like everybody else.Should he have the option not to pay dues also?
Sorry I have to disagree with you on that.No. He is paying for union representation. If he wants to vote, he needs to put in his time like everybody else.
No it wasnt but that is apple and oranges.Sorry I have to disagree with you on that.
100 years ago women weren't allowed to vote , was that fair?
Maybe a weighted system would work if you want everybody to vote.Sorry I have to disagree with you on that.
100 years ago women weren't allowed to vote , was that fair?
That wouldn't be fair.Maybe a weighted system would work if you want everybody to vote.
Under 10 years-1 share
10-20 years=2 shares
20-30 years=3 shares
over 30 years= 4 shares
That’s exactly 100% without question that’s what I’m saying. They could have helped in their own way, wether yes or no.I know people who are leaving in a month. Are you saying they are lazy for not voting?
That wouldn't be fair.[/QUOTMaybe not but the current system is not fair and not working.
I disagree. An 18 year old employee who has been there for 60 days doesnt give 2 poops about voting. He shouldnt have a voice in the future of the company until he has put his time in.