Immigration

[DriveInDriveOut]

It will take both chambers and the pen of whatever POTUS we have at the time to secure the border.

One party holding control of the house, senate, and executive is a terrible situation.... no matter which one it is.

It shouldn't ever be a party issue. National security should be bi-partisan.

Neither party is arguing about national security, they're arguing about entitlements.

 

[Babagounj]

ILLEGALS Pay Coyotes Thousands of $$$ to Sneak Into America & Send Billions More to Home Countries but Can’t Afford $680 to Apply for US Citizenship?

 

[Brown echo]

It will take both chambers and the pen of whatever POTUS we have at the time to secure the border. Unless Texas, Arizona, and Cali want to act alone. It shouldn't ever be a party issue. National security should be bi-partisan. It truly is sad that it's not.I don't care who does it or who hasn't done it in the past. It just needs to be done and done soon.

SWEET DREAMS ARE MADE OF THIS......

 

[Brown echo]

ILLEGALS Pay Coyotes Thousands of $$$ to Sneak Into America & Send Billions More to Home Countries but Can’t Afford $680 to Apply for US Citizenship?

I APPLAUD THIS INTELLIGENT MAN!!!!

 

[MAKAVELI]

ILLEGALS Pay Coyotes Thousands of $$$ to Sneak Into America & Send Billions More to Home Countries but Can’t Afford $680 to Apply for US Citizenship?

This is from the article you posted.

While President Bush says the U.S. needs more “cheap labor” from south of the border to do jobs Americans aren’t willing to do, the case of the Silverios shows there are indeed uncalculated costs involved in the importation of such labor – public support and uninsured medical costs.

If right wing America doesn't want to pay for health and social services for these undocumented then you need to take a stand against businesses that hire them.

 

[Babagounj]

I wonder if they could use their EBT card to pay the citizenship fee ?

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

I wonder if they could use their EBT card to pay the citizenship fee ?

Better question, why don't you guys stop using immigrants as scapegoats, and just go after the entitlements?

 

[Overpaid Union Thug]

Better question, why don't you guys stop using immigrants as scapegoats, and just go after the entitlements?

As Americans we are ENTITLED to a secure border. Illegals getting entitlements is a symptom. Cutting the entitlements won't solve the problem. They will still come.

Sent using BrownCafe App

 

[The Other Side]

As Americans we are ENTITLED to a secure border. Illegals getting entitlements is a symptom. Cutting the entitlements won't solve the problem. They will still come.

Sent using BrownCafe App

THUG, why dont you acknowledge that BUSH and the republicans in congress and the senate, begining in 2002, 2004 and 2008 are the cause of this immigration influx from central america and south america.

Bush's own signature is on the bill that was passed by both houses authorizing and welcoming these children, so why dont we hear you blaming Bush for this mess?

The border patrol is under the Obama watch is only enforcing the BUSH law, and they cannot violate the law unless the republicans in the house repeal the bill.

TOS.

 

[Babagounj]

Because Bush no longer sits in the Oval Office , or because of your BDS you haven't noticed this .

 

[The Other Side]

Because Bush no longer sits in the Oval Office , or because of your BDS you haven't noticed this .

So, in other words, someone can start the problem and be held unaccountable for the results?

Is that your logic?

TOS.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

As Americans we are ENTITLED to a secure border. Illegals getting entitlements is a symptom. Cutting the entitlements won't solve the problem. They will still come.

If there were no entitlements for them, then what would be your problem with them coming here?

 

[UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)]

As Americans we are ENTITLED to a secure border. Illegals getting entitlements is a symptom. Cutting the entitlements won't solve the problem. They will still come.

Sent using BrownCafe App

Care to tell us under which amendment we could find this?


Resident know-it-all.

 

[moreluck]

If there were no entitlements for them, then what would be your problem with them coming here?

jumping in line ahead of others is a real problem

 

[Babagounj]

So, in other words, someone can start the problem and be held unaccountable for the results?

Is that your logic?

TOS.

Fast & Furious , Cash for Clunkers , General Motors , Solar Energy , IRS missing e-mails , etc.

Then yes.

 

[moreluck]

Care to tell us under which amendment we could find this?


Resident know-it-all.

the Constitution requires the federal government to secure the borders if state legislatures or governors ask.
The group cites Section 4, Article 4 of the U.S. Constitution, which states:
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/lawmakers-told-constitution-requires-secure-border/#5syPfiC8h5DYid23.99

 

[The Other Side]

the Constitution requires the federal government to secure the borders if state legislatures or governors ask.
The group cites Section 4, Article 4 of the U.S. Constitution, which states:
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/lawmakers-told-constitution-requires-secure-border/#5syPfiC8h5DYid23.99

Invasion??? You are now using the word Invasion??

If you are talking about immigrants, now you are labeling them as INVADERS??

This shows how truly clueless you are on the situation. Somehow you try to twist the constitution to fix your arguments?

Look, regardless of what any previous law says, the BUSH law passed in 2002 and re authorized in 2004 and 2008 over rides any previous laws and allows central american and south american children to come here and STAY at your expense.

Of course, by "your expense" i mean, your paid tax dollars.

Why do you attempt to cling to some lame argument over this influx of unacccompanied children, when the current law on the books , created by the republicans in congress and senate and signed by George W. Bush authorizing it, has to be enforced by this administration?

Those of you ignorant to the current law try to simply repeat the latest talking points from FOX and AM right wing radio and then convince yourselves that you are informed.

Simply amazing.

TOS.

 

[Brown echo]

Invasion??? You are now using the word Invasion??

If you are talking about immigrants, now you are labeling them as INVADERS??

This shows how truly clueless you are on the situation. Somehow you try to twist the constitution to fix your arguments?

Look, regardless of what any previous law says, the BUSH law passed in 2002 and re authorized in 2004 and 2008 over rides any previous laws and allows central american and south american children to come here and STAY at your expense.

Of course, by "your expense" i mean, your paid tax dollars.

Why do you attempt to cling to some lame argument over this influx of unacccompanied children, when the current law on the books , created by the republicans in congress and senate and signed by George W. Bush authorizing it, has to be enforced by this administration?

Those of you ignorant to the current law try to simply repeat the latest talking points from FOX and AM right wing radio and then convince yourselves that you are informed.

Simply amazing.

TOS.

 

[Overpaid Union Thug]

Care to tell us under which amendment we could find this?


Resident know-it-all.

the Constitution requires the federal government to secure the borders if state legislatures or governors ask.
The group cites Section 4, Article 4 of the U.S. Constitution, which states:
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/lawmakers-told-constitution-requires-secure-border/#5syPfiC8h5DYid23.99

 

[IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U]

NOTHING GOOD TO SEE HERE FOLKS.........

Do you,HAVE A GREEN CARD?