Indictment

[vantexan]

"Trump and his allies lost nearly all the more than 60 cases they brought challenging the 2020 election results, the report noted. Twenty were dismissed before a hearing on the merits, 14 were dropped by Trump and his supporters, and 30 included a hearing on the merits, it found."

Tell me again how many of those cases were actually heard by a judge and jury instead of being tossed out without adjudication? A judge deciding it doesn't have merit to go forward isn't the same thing.

 

[Thebrownblob]

A group of conservatives, including prominent lawyers and retired federal judges, issued a 72-page report on Thursday categorically rebutting each of the claims made in court by former President Donald Trump and his supporters over the 2020 election results.

The report, “LOST, NOT STOLEN: The Conservative Case that Trump Lost and Biden Won the 2020 Presidential Election,” looked at more than 60 court cases Trump and his supporters filed and lost in six key battleground states. It reached the “unequivocal” conclusion that the former Republican president’s claims were unsupportable — which Trump’s own Department of Homeland Security as well as election officials nationwide debunked days after the 2020 election.

“There is absolutely no evidence of fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election on the magnitude necessary to shift the result in any state, let alone the nation as a whole. In fact, there was no fraud that changed the outcome in even a single precinct,” the report says.

The report is signed by retired federal appeals court judges Thomas B. Griffith, J. Michael Luttig and Michael W. McConnell, former Solicitor General Theodore B. Olson, former US Sens. John Danforth and Gordon H. Smith, longtime Republican election lawyer Benjamin L. Ginsberg and veteran Republican congressional chief of staff David Hoppe.

 

[vantexan]

Fact Check-Does ‘2000 Mules’ provide evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. presidential election?

A documentary directed by conservative commentator Dinesh D’Souza claims it can prove widespread fraud was carried out during the 2020 presidential election in the United States. Reuters Fact Check examined the main claims presented in the film and did not find any concrete...

www.reuters.com

Evidence Gaps in '2000 Mules' - FactCheck.org

A conservative film now playing in select theaters around the country isn't "determinative, definitive" proof of widespread voter fraud, as former President Donald Trump has claimed.

www.factcheck.org

Former AG Bill Barr discredited the ‘2,000 Mules’ voter fraud film in a Jan. 6 hearing - Poynter

The documentary alleged massive voter fraud involving ballot drop boxes and cellphone location data but, as Barr detailed, it does not prove its claims.

www.poynter.org

So they say. How much time did Barr's DOJ investigate such claims? He was pretty quick throwing Trump under the bus. That was Trump's big flaw. His management style created enemies. D'Souza should do a documentary called "2000 Knives."

 

[fishtm2001]

“The Big Lie has been good only for Trump and has brought him millions in donations, which some evidence suggests may have been mishandled. The Big Lie, and the related violence, election interference and other perceived misconduct, was and is an affront to this nation and its first principles. It has permanently soiled the history pages and deepened the abyss that divides our country and continues to expand due to the delusions and lack of accountability of politicians in both parties.”

former donald lawyer Ty Cobb

 

[vantexan]

former donald lawyer Ty Cobb

More examples of The Swamp getting rid of the biggest threat to their graft.

 

[Jerry the Mouse]

Tell me again how many of those cases were actually heard by a judge and jury instead of being tossed out without adjudication? A judge deciding it doesn't have merit to go forward isn't the same thing.

30

 

[vantexan]

30

Not heard by judge and jury in a trial.

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

Fact Check-Does ‘2000 Mules’ provide evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. presidential election?

A documentary directed by conservative commentator Dinesh D’Souza claims it can prove widespread fraud was carried out during the 2020 presidential election in the United States. Reuters Fact Check examined the main claims presented in the film and did not find any concrete...

www.reuters.com

Evidence Gaps in '2000 Mules' - FactCheck.org

A conservative film now playing in select theaters around the country isn't "determinative, definitive" proof of widespread voter fraud, as former President Donald Trump has claimed.

www.factcheck.org

Former AG Bill Barr discredited the ‘2,000 Mules’ voter fraud film in a Jan. 6 hearing - Poynter

The documentary alleged massive voter fraud involving ballot drop boxes and cellphone location data but, as Barr detailed, it does not prove its claims.

www.poynter.org

Factcheck.org and the poytner institute.
LMFAO!!!!
So gullible.

 

[Up In Smoke]

Looks like Bannon will be getting passed around for 30 days or so.

 

[newolddude]

Looks like Bannon will be getting passed around for 30 days or so.

Good. It will give him a chance to sober up/dry out.