where did i say they have a right to kill civilians?
Your posts regarding this particular issue tend to have 2 opposing ideas that come together to form an incoherent statement.
1. No need to kill civilians/you don't approve of killing civilians.
2. Actually, killing Israeli civilians is fine and you approve of it because it's a just cause and is supported by international law.
For example:
Palestinian-Israel Conflict (War?) | Current Events
Define please......this social justice. Is it appointing Supreme Court Judges based on sex/race/sexual orientation? Like that? Or making commercials based solely on skin color? Or how about promotions at work? Not sure how to answer your questions, I can only say it depends on the situation...www.browncafe.com
"No need to kill civilians and under intl law the palestinians have a right to violently rebel against the land stealin israelis. i encourage violent rebellion"
intl law does not support killing civilians im sure
if you are killing people who are violently stealing land, then they are not civilians
So you're saying Israel has no civilians and it's therefore fine for Hamas to kill them all under international law.
No, Israel is likely a mix of colonizers and civilians
Well, first time hearing you say that not all Israelis are colonizers. Which ones aren't colonizers?