Corporate “persons” need to get called out if they are giving money to the politicians who support voter disenfranchisement bills.Seems like you're forgetting Jim Crow targeted black peons and not corporate 'persons'?
they should also be called out when they support illegal votingCorporate “persons” need to get called out if they are giving money to the politicians who support voter disenfranchisement bills.
What illegal voting?they should also be called out when they support illegal voting
been there discussed thatWhat illegal voting?
Allegedly. No proof.been there discussed that
it benifits your side. You wont look for any proofAllegedly. No proof.
That’s the intent of the Georgia laws. They haven’t even offered a reason to eliminate early voting on Sundays. They are doing it because souls to the polls was effective in driving black voter turnout. Republicans don’t want black people to vote, it’s their party platform.Where is the proof of voter suppression?
That’s the intent of the Georgia laws. They haven’t even offered a reason to eliminate early voting on Sundays. They are doing it because souls to the polls was effective in driving black voter turnout. Republicans don’t want black people to vote, it’s their party platform.
Ope, I misunderstood you -- I'm sorry, it's current events. I thought you were referring to the tweet itself as a Jim Crow sequel, not the attempt to disenfranchise people, now I follow what you're saying. I would add: ultimately corporations are indifferent to anything besides profit.Corporate “persons” need to get called out if they are giving money to the politicians who support voter disenfranchisement bills.
My side was Libertarian. I admit we didn't win.it benifits your side. You wont look for any proof
@rickyb,Corporate “persons” need to get called out if they are giving money to the politicians who support voter disenfranchisement bills.
It's also opinion that the election was stolen or there was widespread illegal voting.@rickyb,
This is another example of an opinion that is apparently being presented as fact.
Like I told you, 99.9% of the posts in Current Events are opinions ... rarely is a fact seen here.
hmm i dont really understand, i more familar with the definition of terrorism. im going to look up the definition a bit since you are trying to teach me and i havent really figured it out.@rickyb,
This is another example of an opinion that is apparently being presented as fact.
Like I told you, 99.9% of the posts in Current Events are opinions ... rarely is a fact seen here.
Where is the proof of voter suppression?
@rickyb,That’s the intent of the Georgia laws.
This is an example of an outright lie that is being presented as fact.Republicans don’t want black people to vote, it’s their party platform.
i think its a fact trump lost because heIt's also opinion that the election was stolen or there was widespread illegal voting.