Lewiston, Maine Mass Shooting

[sailfish]

Lol who sets those limits and I think he reached his limit last night when he broke the law to kill people.

Under what criteria? They already had a law. Interesting you always want a bureaucrat or politician to fix your problem even though we see how awful they do at pretty much everything.

Keeps conveniently ignoring questions like this.

 

[Babagounj]

I have always wondered why the media will show responding officers with long guns but never say what kind of long guns they are carrying ?

 

[Wally]

The recently passed Massachusetts House Bill would restrict anyone who lives in a condo from possessing a weapon without approval from the Condo Association.
What a joke.

Good luck on that bill being constitutional.

 

[newolddude]

“What shocks me is nobody shot back at him - part of safety in Maine is everyone carries.”

At least 18 people killed in Lewiston, Maine, shootings, governor says. Follow live updates. - The Boston Globe

At least 18 people are dead in shootings in Lewiston, Maine, according to officials. Authorities identified a Bowdoin man, Robert Card, as a suspect.

www.bostonglobe.com

 

[newolddude]

I have always wondered why the media will show responding officers with long guns but never say what kind of long guns they are carrying ?

Because those are trained law enforcement carrying those guns as part of their job.

 

[Wally]

I have always wondered why the media will show responding officers with long guns but never say what kind of long guns they are carrying ?

Most in the media see a pea shooter as a gun. They are clueless about guns.

 

[Babagounj]

Good luck on that bill being constitutional.

The democrats don't care { one party state } because it will be months or years before a ruling is handed down.
This approved House Bill did not have the approval from The Association of the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police, ever they said it was unenforceable.

 

[Babagounj]

Because those are trained law enforcement carrying those guns as part of their job.

I know that, but why not mention it ?
Could it be that they too are carrying the very weapons that the gov't wants banned.

 

[oldngray]

The democrats don't care { one party state } because it will be months or years before a ruling is handed down.
This approved House Bill did not have the approval from The Association of the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police, ever they said it was unenforceable.

They will be like NY and after courts rule against them they will just try again with almost the same law.

 

[UnionStrong]

The recently passed Massachusetts House Bill would restrict anyone who lives in a condo from possessing a weapon without approval from the Condo Association.
What a joke.

As if I would tell them. Unconstitutional

 

[sailfish]

Because those are trained law enforcement carrying those guns as part of their job.

Until the narrative is inconvenient. Then it's time to defund the police and riot because ACAB.

 

[UnionStrong]

Baloney. You're free to live however you want as long as you aren't hurting others or forcing your views on others. The problem with trans people and their backers is they want to force people to accept them and are willing to get people fired if they don't. And they want to indoctrinate kids as a way to gain acceptance.

Y'all are quick to blame all mass shootings on conservatives but when it turns out it's a liberal you quickly sweep it under the rug. We still haven't seen the manifesto of the trans shooter in Nashville. There was no attempt to comfort the parents there.

And you never talk about the many people who were able to defend themselves because they had a gun. Mass shootings are horrible. But anyone who thinks criminals will give up their guns like everyone else when ordered to is living in a fantasy world. And the pandemic demonstrated the lengths the government might go if it had total power. Guns help keep that in check.

From my cold dead hands

 

[oldngray]

Until the narrative is inconvenient. Then it's time to defund the police and riot because ACAB.

Defund the police while paying private security for politicians.

The little people don't count.

 

[UnionStrong]

I do trust me I do. I posted about my family and friends. I think that’s what is at stake. Not hiding anything just not willing to debate on an anonymous forum with complete strangers who are stirring the pot.

 

[newolddude]

Until the narrative is inconvenient. Then it's time to defund the police and riot because ACAB.

Police need to be better trained and better paid. We also need more money for social services workers to handle people with mental issues, the homeless etc and no have those things dumped on cops. All while weeding out bad cops who double dip/triple dip, are abusive or shouldn't be in law enforcement.

Refund the police.

 

[Next Day Err]

Under what criteria? They already had a law. Interesting you always want a bureaucrat or politician to fix your problem even though we see how awful they do at pretty much everything.

Laws can be modified, no? And emphasis on enforcement can be changed.

What the hell do you think should be done? Anything?

 

[Thebrownblob]

Laws can be modified, no? And emphasis on enforcement can be changed.

What the hell do you think should be done? Anything?

What the hell are you talking about? I said there’s already laws. You’re just spouting generalities what does modification mean? If the guy didn’t commit a crime and they were laws in place already if he had mental problems what else did you want and why don’t you realize that the system doesn’t work? creating more laws won’t help.

 

[nWo]

 

[Next Day Err]

What the hell are you talking about? I said there’s already laws. You’re just spouting generalities what does modification mean? If the guy didn’t commit a crime and they were laws in place already if he had mental problems what else did you want and why don’t you realize that the system doesn’t work? creating more laws won’t help.

Defeatist and stupid. Of course more and better laws could and would help. Are you kidding me?

What do YOU think should be done? Anything? Nothing? You’d rather see more Americans drop like flies in a flurry of ing bullets than try something else?

 

[Thebrownblob]

Defeatist and stupid. Of course more and better laws could and would help. Are you kidding me?

What do YOU think should be done? Anything? Nothing? You’d rather see more Americans drop like flies in a flurry of ing bullets than try something else?

You’re the one who thinks there should be more laws, even though we had a perfectly good justification to take his gun with the law on the book in Maine, so why don’t you stop pussyfooting around and tell us your plan? Anyone with half a brain already knows what your plan is that’s why you don’t want to say it.