And?go look at the news, the inspector general found them
What corruption are you referring to?Nope, I wouldn't defend them them. Big difference between actively making excuses for and d
It would be impossible to throw as many stones at my side as opposed to the other. My side is nowhere near as corrupt as the Republicans
Who know? We shall see.And?
we will see what rabbit hole it goes downAnd?
Republican perverts just want to read sexts between the two people who were bumping uglies.I believe they were missing for a technical reason but if you believe you're going to find some evidence of a secret society yeah you need a tinfoil hat.
You’re on the side of people waving around Russian intel screaming Russian collusion after having 8 years of concessions to Russia, the ones who give debate questions ahead of time, delete classified intel emails and texts, wave the immigration laws for votes, ignore the Clinton foundation misuse of funds and possible pay to play, want to nominate a socialist who’s wife and him are knee deep in a scandal, a party with a race baiting history reaching back over a century to current days, the party most media outlets are affiliated with and defend daily, the party trying doing the most damage to our privately property rights, freedom of speech, freedom of press, gun rights list goes on, I just don’t get it.Nope, I wouldn't defend them them. Big difference between actively making excuses for and d
It would be impossible to throw as many stones at my side as opposed to the other. My side is nowhere near as corrupt as the Republicans
This fbi scandal wouldn’t be shocking at all to me after seeing the obstruction of justice done during the Hillary investigation, the woman is a felon. They covered up a mistake to try and influence the election. All the press skewed polls and did what they could as well. You still lost because your party is a dumpster fire that hates the constitution and individual liberty. Hates capitalism and America, wants to fundamentally change it by any means necessary.Nope, I wouldn't defend them them. Big difference between actively making excuses for and d
It would be impossible to throw as many stones at my side as opposed to the other. My side is nowhere near as corrupt as the Republicans
Which party has had indictments ,and guilty pleas?You’re on the side of people waving around Russian intel screaming Russian collusion after having 8 years of concessions to Russia, the ones who give debate questions ahead of time, delete classified intel emails and texts, wave the immigration laws for votes, ignore the Clinton foundation misuse of funds and possible pay to play, want to nominate a socialist who’s wife and him are knee deep in a scandal, a party with a race baiting history reaching back over a century to current days, the party most media outlets are affiliated with and defend daily, the party trying doing the most damage to our privately property rights, freedom of speech, freedom of press, gun rights list goes on, I just don’t get it.
Roy Moore was garbage for more than just hurting children the man was an idiot in general. Mo Brooks should be the senator, Republican establishes botched it in favor of Luther.
You talk about throwing stones get out of here with your liberal fruity pebbles, I brought up uranium one with Clinton foundation corruption. It was a blanket statement.Which party has had indictments ,and guilty pleas?
All you got is innuendo and crack pot conspiracy theories . If she was as dirty as the right claims. Why no charges? You forgot Uranium One. Where has that led?
No indictments and guilty pleas for anything connected to the president. And it's easy to stay out of trouble like Hillary did when you have an entire administration covering for her. The whole Russian collusion scam is unraveling because, as always, the truth will come out. Literally an attempt to destroy the sitting president by people determined to keep their party in power.Which party has had indictments ,and guilty pleas?
All you got is innuendo and crack pot conspiracy theories . If she was as dirty as the right claims. Why no charges? You forgot Uranium One. Where has that led?
You are just lucky to have such an extensive vocabulary!Google it, quit being lazy and expecting everyone to spoon feed you answers
Hey @cheryl is this allowed?Republican perverts just want to read sexts between the two people who were bumping uglies.
I hear Netscape is really good!Quit assuming everybody uses google......never have, never will!!! Yahoo is my friend.....get on your knees and give thanks!!
Please don't bother Cheryl with this silliness.
She takes it out on me!
I think he needs a time out. Are you saying that's ok?Please don't bother Cheryl with this silliness.
She takes it out on me!
There is a difference between 'excusing' something and judging something 'irrelevant'.You may not defend it, but you excuse it.
I actually enjoy the spurious display of big red 'X's on the landscape.I think he needs a time out. Are you saying that's ok?