Bubblehead
My Senior Picture
Desperation = trollAge=Wisdom; youth=impetuousness.
Desperation = trollAge=Wisdom; youth=impetuousness.
22.4s are a concession everywhere.22.4's are not a concession in the West
It was an better deal for our Cover Drivers here.22.4s are a concession everywhere.
So? Cover drivers finally had the opportunity to go friend/t then convert to RCPD later. No one here complains about 22.4s. They did not want to work Sat or Sun so 22.4. They wanted 9.5s to go down, 22.4s helped. They love that management has to go 22.4 as part of the ratio. You want to push that 22.4 was a concession and I get that but it's not in the West when the option was forcing "any non-consecutive 5 days in 7" as Zuckerman did so they could staff Saturday & Sunday delivery. Get off the propaganda and read some actual contracts OZ has negotiated.We are obviously going to disagree...Just look at the vote, if you subtract the clueless part timers who were willing to vote on anything to get that 3 dollar an hour raise, the vast majority of the "NO" votes were cast by high seniority full timers in all the regions. These 22.4's were a "Concession" no matter what you say, producing a continuing four year progression of minor league RPCD's, that would still be making 5 dollar less per hour than their counterparts once they hit top rate. These 22.4's are not bid the same way as RPCD's, they sign up on a extra work list inside the building that for the most part are ignored by seniority part timers...They were designed to be filled by outside new hires, any protection language for our current RPCD's does not apply to these 22.4's..(9.5) protection.
We negotiate our own work rules but since you bring it up, you should probably look at who has negotiated part-time Feeder (O'Brien). Oh so now you think there is some great inequity? Where is this concept you speak of in the contract? Is it in Article 40?What if the Company decides next contract to negotiate a two tier pay scale in your Feeder Departments, bypassing seniority and any bidding rights on start times...A permanent "On Call List", would you have a problem with that? Your point of view that these 22.4 positions will be paying into your Pension and Health and Welfare funds and that is all that matters goes against the concept of Equal Union Work for Equal Union Pay..
We had a vote and the 2/3 margin was not met. You don't get a do-over because you don't like it. This idea that we can just ignore rules we don't like without going through the official process to change them is immature. Get over it. Why couldn't you get the vote out? Did you just put all your efforts on social media that has lost TDU election after election?That 2/3..50% Participation clause that you believed Hoffa had to apply because he had not choice is false....After the tallies were counted and the Company discovered that it was voted down, they issued an official statement that they were : Willing to go back to the table and continue further negotiations"... Hoffa and the negotiation committee declined to go further and forced the contract...."WHY"?
Were you even here in 1997?Why are you so scared of "Ron Carey"...? (Fear mongering)...what is so scary that a "strike"...
I've been here over 32 years dude. Supporting the strike while it was happening was one thing and I did to a level you could not even match. The fact is we were sold a pack of lies. That was a pissing match between Ron Carey and Jim Kelly. Carey was itching to strike and got us to authorize it when he could have just kept negotiating and working under the old contract. Any maroon should know that you don't strike in August especially in Phoenix when it's 110+. You wait until November when a strike will have more effect and exert more pressure. O'Brien isn't that smart but he's itching to strike too as are all of your "vote no" people. Again, mark my words.Where you around in l997?...Even Hoffa supported that strike because of the Company's failed attempt of taking over our pensions (nationwide). There will be no national strike, lockout or labor stoppage in 2023...the economic conditions are too perilous, and that Central States Issue is finally resolved, What major issue would cause either party to force a strike now...?
Vairma will get us a fair contract, O'Brien will be unreasonable and push the Company into a corner. Keep stock on how many new loaded trucks your members buy next year, how many houses.....they will be the first to cross.It will a first national negotiated Contract for both parties in leadership..Carol will probably want to start early to get it over with, and O'Brien or Vairma will be willing to do the same...This Pandemic has changed the timetable and the rules...
<yawn> Thanks for playing.Desperation = troll
Does this somehow make my point about the lack of participation less valid? Should it have been a Facebook poll? One of those Instagram Q&A's? Maybe there is a Tik Tok option you can suggest that will motivate people to participate?Wasn't the contract vote in 2018 done electronically, either by phone or the internet?
It would've been a win had they replaced cover drivers with 22.4s, but now they have both.It was an better deal for our Cover Drivers here.
So? Cover drivers finally had the opportunity to go friend/t then convert to RCPD later. No one here complains about 22.4s. They did not want to work Sat or Sun so 22.4. They wanted 9.5s to go down, 22.4s helped. They love that management has to go 22.4 as part of the ratio. You want to push that 22.4 was a concession and I get that but it's not in the West when the option was forcing "any non-consecutive 5 days in 7" as Zuckerman did so they could staff Saturday & Sunday delivery. Get off the propaganda and read some actual contracts OZ has negotiated.
We negotiate our own work rules but since you bring it up, you should probably look at who has negotiated part-time Feeder (O'Brien). Oh so now you think there is some great inequity? Where is this concept you speak of in the contract? Is it in Article 40?
We had a vote and the 2/3 margin was not met. You don't get a do-over because you don't like it. This idea that we can just ignore rules we don't like without going through the official process to change them is immature. Get over it. Why couldn't you get the vote out? Did you just put all your efforts on social media that has lost TDU election after election?
Were you even here in 1997?
I've been here over 32 years dude. Supporting the strike while it was happening was one thing and I did to a level you could not even match. The fact is we were sold a pack of lies. That was a pissing match between Ron Carey and Jim Kelly. Carey was itching to strike and got us to authorize it when he could have just kept negotiating and working under the old contract. Any maroon should know that you don't strike in August especially in Phoenix when it's 110+. You wait until November when a strike will have more effect and exert more pressure. O'Brien isn't that smart but he's itching to strike too as are all of your "vote no" people. Again, mark my words.
Vairma will get us a fair contract, O'Brien will be unreasonable and push the Company into a corner. Keep stock on how many new loaded trucks your members buy next year, how many houses.....they will be the first to cross.
How many more deflective posts are you going to make that ignore the facts about JW harming my members, cheating us out of Feeder jobs and $58,000 in penalty pay? Lot of false concern for a subclass of Package driver when you ignore that the more who move into Feeder means more RCPDs.
Ah....straight out of Dave's play book.<yawn> Thanks for playing.
Nope, just shows again how you really don't know what you are talking about and are only here to advance the political agenda of your local's Principal Officer.Does this somehow make my point about the lack of participation less valid? Should it have been a Facebook poll? One of those Instagram Q&A's? Maybe there is a Tik Tok option you can suggest that will motivate people to participate?
What does he know? He doesn't even like saltwater TaffyAh....straight out of Dave's play book.
That'll score you big point s here.
Nope, just shows again how you really don't know what you are talking about and are only here to advance the political agenda of your local's Principal Officer.
What does he know? He doesn't even like saltwater Taffy
104 is in a right to work state, many don’t even join the unionHe's a "Commie"...
By cover drivers do you mean temp FT delivery drivers? What a job killer. All of our cover drivers are FT without a permanent route.It would've been a win had they replaced cover drivers with 22.4s, but now they have both.
No he means PTers that drive full-time with none of the protections and pension benefits of a FTer.By cover drivers do you mean temp FT delivery drivers? What a job killer. All of our cover drivers are FT without a permanent route.
Hence the name, cover.By cover drivers do you mean temp FT delivery drivers? What a job killer. All of our cover drivers are FT without a permanent route.
If we were to remove the cover driver language we would have lost the utility bid ratio language as well. That would have been very bad because its extra protection in the Southwest to force the company to create more FT utility driver's.It would've been a win had they replaced cover drivers with 22.4s, but now they have both.
I don't disagree, but, I'm also not going to say 22.4s aren't a concession because of them.If we were to remove the cover driver language we would have lost the utility bid ratio language as well. That would have been very bad because its extra protection in the Southwest to force the company to create more FT utility driver's.
They are definitely a concession. They're just a upgraded cover driver for us and a pension boost.I don't disagree, but, I'm also not going to say 22.4s aren't a concession because of them.
If that's the Dave I think you are referring to he would have stolen that from me.Ah....straight out of Dave's play book.
That'll score you big point s here.
You're splitting hairs because you are desperate and have your head so far up OZazzz you are fine with sacrificing my members and good Feeder jobs. That speaks volumes about you and your agenda.Nope, just shows again how you really don't know what you are talking about and are only here to advance the political agenda of your local's Principal Officer.