UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)
Well-Known Member
Every financial advisor I have talked to suggests, as a general rule, that you start at 62.
Bird in the hand concept.
Mine has me waiting until 67, if not later.
Every financial advisor I have talked to suggests, as a general rule, that you start at 62.
Bird in the hand concept.
Why don't you take what you put in????you and many more anti gov't types will take out far,far far more then they, you put in....Moreluck ...Is The true Socialist herePeople of my age paid into this all of our working lives..........you bet I'm first in line to get MY MONEY!!! You can count it under welfare if you want (like Obama does), but I'm just withdrawing what I paid in. I'd be foolish if I didn't.
I didn't say they were lazy........they are here illegally !!!! As illegals, they don't get jack.
After the comma, I mention lazy asses.....those that can work but won't get off the couch to do so.
You do realize that there are democrats in RED states?In other words, RED STATES, eh moreluck?
TOS.
Like you have a guarantee you'll make it past 62...........I'd fire that advisor.Mine has me waiting until 67, if not later.
Sadly, Both Social Security and Medicare recipients are counted when they total welfare recipients. It's Obama's way.Upstate NY is correct when he said that I have handled my money and investments extremely well over the years.
TOS is absolutely way off target to claim social security is the same as handouts -- --People -like all American's that worked --had money forcibly confiscated for Social Security.
The return on MY investments are huge compared to what the Government did with MY money that I may or may not ever get back from them !!
Like you have a guarantee you'll make it past 62...........I'd fire that advisor.
Does a 62 yr old individual who has worked their whole life, have more right to social security that they have paid into while working, or, a 25-35 yr old unemployed scab that has made a career off entitlements????When you say takers, you are talking about social security recipients, right? Oh wait, youre one of those takers, I forgot.
TOS
Does a 62 yr old individual who has worked their whole life, have more right to social security that they have paid into while working, or, a 25-35 yr old unemployed scab that has made a career off entitlements????
But you don't have to work or pay in to the numerous entitlement programs.You have to work at least 40 quarters to earn full Social Security benefits.
What an awesome "First" couple..!
So you get hit & killed by a bus at 66 7/8 years of age. You could've been collecting S.S. since age 62.....but with your guy's way, you never see a dime. That' a real winner you have there.