I fixed it for ya, Ralphie.
Who the friend*&k is Ralph?
I fixed it for ya, Ralphie.
Actually Im catholic.So you're on the baby killer side??
So you vote for them based on what? Their good looks? No wonder Canada is so screwed up.
See thats where your all screwed up. Yes some poor people vote for democrats and some rich people vote for Republicans but the majority of people are just like you and I.
Why you choose to dwell on poor people and the few who abuse the system instead of directing your anger at the people who abuse the system in the name of greed is beyond me.
CCCCCCChhhhhhhheeeeeeerrrrrrrrrryyyyyyyyyyllllllllllll!!!!!!!!
Unionman's calling right-wingers morons. That's not nice.
I am not sure your going to understand this, but I will try nonetheless. As you correctly stated Democrats rely on poor folks for the votes to keep them in office, so why would they support policies that would reduce the number of poor people? As poor people become not so poor they may start to vote more republicans into office, and this, my friend, is counter intuitive to a Democrat looking to maintain their place in government. So what do they do? They come up with government controlled social entitlement programs to get more people under government control(Social Security, medicare, Obamacare). This in turn requires them to raise taxes, which reduces wealth,(more poor people to vote for them), and thus keeps them in power. This kind of power hungry mentality in government is far far far more dangerous than any greed based abuse you reference taking place in the private sector.
quite correct.
More so today than ever, since the tea party movement started the dems have seen their base slip away.
Now if they could magically make 12-20 million new voters appear , their fears would melt away.
I would think making 12-20 million illegals legal would help.
I can still hear ny College English teacher lecturing us on logical fallacies. Tie used, I believe, ad hominem, attacking the person and not the issue, In another post he reminded me that gay rights were a state issue so i could not marry my "boyfriend" Obama.If Tie's only defense now, is name calling, then I worked him down pretty good. LOL
First he was posting unneccesary posts about Canadians flocking south for healthcare in every thread.
Then he got upset, because I got a "me being gay" post removed.
So, now back to alcohol, where it all began.
Whatever rocks his boat.
Each to thier own.
My only point, and you know this as well, is we have a member here who has fought alcoholism and to compare a drinking a beer while on the clock with someone who drinks to excess on a daily basis is simply not valid.
I can still hear ny College English teacher lecturing us on logical fallacies. Tie used, I believe, ad hominem, attacking the person and not the issue, In another post he reminded me that gay rights were a state issue so i could not marry my "boyfriend" Obama.
If his mgmt style is anything like he is here on BC. the Teamsters in my building would have him for lunch. Remember i am from NorCal we don't take too much from mgmt
If the comparison does not kill you it may make you stronger. Liberals have been going out of their way to find extreme examples of right wing bigotry and align them with the conservative movements. Liberals now are deliberatly misrepresenting theirselves as tea partiers in order to further propogate these misrepresentations.
if this is the liberal course you folks wish to lead conservatives down then please be strong , don't cry when we remind you of what your liberal coalition is comprised of.
I challenge you to advance your education past a couple of commonly known latin words to actually delve into the games your liberal leadership is presently engaged in.
Anyone know the current estimate of Illegals in America?