Mueller report

BigUnionGuy

Got the T-Shirt
55521076_2630994313591381_7821731342663548928_n.jpg
 

MrFedEx

Engorged Member
Really? Which parts? Who proved them? Might be news to Bruce Ohr, the DOJ'S #4 guy, who warned the FBI that it was unverified, uncorroborated, which he said under oath.

A lot of people have said the dossier was fake, when there's a lot of it that is true (read it, I have). While nobody has produced a pee tape, that's been the focus of most of the media...on the salacious stuff. I could care less if Trump likes to get peed on or vice versa. The remaining details are consistent and have played out as true.
 

MrFedEx

Engorged Member
Except Steele admitted under oath in a British court last year that he copied everything off a website that gets anonymous contributions. That he hadn't verified anything on it, just took what he got online as true.

Wrong. ONE part of the dossier, not the whole thing.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
He left the obstruction decision up to Barr who stated before he didn't believe a president can be guilty of obstruction.
What obstruction? The firing of Comey? The president has the right to fire his employees for any reason except possibly, depending on the situation, to obstruct an investigation. Guess what, it was Rosenstein who appointed a special counsel, not Comey. And Comey admitted to Congress that he leaked info to a friend. He was rightfully fired, especially after he usurped the attorney general's authority by declaring no further investigation of Clinton. That wasn't his right.
 

MAKAVELI

Well-Known Member
What obstruction? The firing of Comey? The president has the right to fire his employees for any reason except possibly, depending on the situation, to obstruct an investigation. Guess what, it was Rosenstein who appointed a special counsel, not Comey. And Comey admitted to Congress that he leaked info to a friend. He was rightfully fired, especially after he usurped the attorney general's authority by declaring no further investigation of Clinton. That wasn't his right.
"It also does not exonerate him"
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
"It also does not exonerate him"
If you say so. What will you say when there's nothing in the report that indicates criminal wrongdoing by Trump? Since no new indictments are recommended there can't possibly be any criminality indicated towards Trump's family in the report. Think Mueller is going to hint at something? Highly doubtful.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
If you say so. What will you say when there's nothing in the report that indicates criminal wrongdoing by Trump? Since no new indictments are recommended there can't possibly be any criminality indicated towards Trump's family in the report. Think Mueller is going to hint at something? Highly doubtful.
That’s what the attorney general wrote.
 

MAKAVELI

Well-Known Member
If you say so. What will you say when there's nothing in the report that indicates criminal wrongdoing by Trump? Since no new indictments are recommended there can't possibly be any criminality indicated towards Trump's family in the report. Think Mueller is going to hint at something? Highly doubtful.
I don't say so. That's a quote from Mueller. Ttku...
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
I don't say so. That's a quote from Mueller. Ttku...
Just read it. In no way can that be construed that the President is guilty of something. Mueller just said there was no evidence of wrongdoing, period. Statement of fact. If you've got evidence, turn it in. Until then you've got nothing.
 
Top